Staff Changes

[Rogean]

Originally Posted by Tupakk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So I can see why people would be very miffed to not openly post the Dramaganda Manifesto on these forums

Good, because that is exactly what you should not be doing.

Guys, read my post. It’s really simple. You don’t go make a god damn public post calling out staff members. You send a forum PM to myself or nilbog.

I just don’t understand how you guys can’t grasp this concept. I’ve seen like 4 posts now of people that are referencing bans for making public posts. Read this until you understand it:

If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.
If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.
If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.

Again that’s a >>>>>FORUM PM<<<<<

Not hard to understand, if you are following this procedure, the only person that sees your PM is the person(s) you sent it to, and thus you can’t possibly be banned by the person you are reporting.

There’s no excuse for not being able to do this.

[Tupakk]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good, because that is exactly what you should not be doing.

Guys, read my post. It’s really simple. You don’t go make a god damn public post calling out staff members. You send a forum PM to myself or nilbog.

I just don’t understand how you guys can’t grasp this concept. I’ve seen like 4 posts now of people that are referencing bans for making public posts. Read this until you understand it:

If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.
If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.
If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.

Again that’s a >>>>>FORUM PM<<<<<

Not hard to understand, if you are following this procedure, the only person that sees your PM is the person(s) you sent it to, and thus you can’t possibly be banned by the person you are reporting.

There’s no excuse for not being able to do this.

Open or hidden it gets back to the person that its about and the fear is still there. Nothing on this server is secret for very long. As I had all this within a day of it going "straight" to Nilbog.

All my point was that I have seen what happens when its hidden and leaks and when its open the result is still the same censorship when it is opinionated and the right person is reading it at the wrong time of their day.

If opinions about staff are now labeled as bashing then I think we all should know. Even if it is an obvious line to you guys, clearly it hasn't been for the rest of the community because of whats been happening.

[Splade]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good, because that is exactly what you should not be doing.

Guys, read my post. It’s really simple. You don’t go make a god damn public post calling out staff members. You send a forum PM to myself or nilbog.

I just don’t understand how you guys can’t grasp this concept. I’ve seen like 4 posts now of people that are referencing bans for making public posts. Read this until you understand it:

If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.
If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.
If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me or Nilbog.

Again that’s a >>>>>FORUM PM<<<<<

Not hard to understand, if you are following this procedure, the only person that sees your PM is the person(s) you sent it to, and thus you can’t possibly be banned by the person you are reporting.

There’s no excuse for not being able to do this.

I mean, I don't have a dog in the race here, I'm mega casual, but I've kept up on the p99 drama lately. From what I understand is people have contacted you multiple times about many issues regarding Sirken in the past and it just gets ignored, only when it was released in a VERY public way was anything actually handled. Again, I've never actually interracted with the p99 staff besides to get a rotted body back and am strictly going off what I've read in the posts here, but I just don't understand why you would only want things handled via PM, if there is proof of wrongdoing, why would you be so adamant against it's release?

[Ivah]

Originally Posted by Splade [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean, I don't have a dog in the race here, I'm mega casual, but I've kept up on the p99 drama lately. From what I understand is people have contacted you multiple times about many issues regarding Sirken in the past and it just gets ignored, only when it was released in a VERY public way was anything actually handled. Again, I've never actually interracted with the p99 staff besides to get a rotted body back and am strictly going off what I've read in the posts here, but I just don't understand why you would only want things handled via PM, if there is proof of wrongdoing, why would you be so adamant against it's release?

Hey look some dumbass drinking the forum trolls kool-aid.

[dcrag]

Originally Posted by Ivah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey look some dumbass drinking the forum trolls kool-aid.

How ironic that you're calling him a troll when he's actually contributing to the conversation.

[Ivah]

Originally Posted by dcrag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How ironic that you're calling him a troll when he's actually contributing to the conversation.

Listen pal looks like your reading comprehension is garbage I called him a dumbass.

[dcrag]

Originally Posted by Ivah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Listen pal looks like your reading comprehension is garbage I called him a dumbass.

Again, a personal attack instead of an actual contribution to the discussion.

[Ivah]

Originally Posted by dcrag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, a personal attack instead of an actual contribution to the discussion.

This guy apparently likes dicks