******Official politics thread ******

[Nexii]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That doesnt work for men. Men are still expected to make themselves in this world, but perhaps THAT is why you decided to hop fence to the other side.

You could try being gay instead if transgender isn't your thing.

[America]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That doesnt work for men. Men are still expected to make themselves in this world, but perhaps THAT is why you decided to hop fence to the other side.

big part of why i jumped is because my preferred role is support. sort of. i will build my nidalee AD when i need to carry a team. but i'd rather play AP in support of a man. my strength is emotional/psychological, and pain tolerance, discipline, and moral support...and manipulation... - not grinding at laser-focus tasks, altho i can do that exceptionally too.

anyway, part of it was a practical consideration, yes. my strength is best leveraged presented in a beautiful, hairless package that smells nice. and the way I imagine touching the ceiling of the world is in exceptional loyal service to a good man, elevated to an art form. so yes i tranned partly because i (was) really really gay, and partly because im a " gold digger " (such a thing exists, but so do honorable discerning high-achieving wives).

fact is, i am worth more $$$ now than i was before. if you want to reduce this to the root. and i will take advantage of it.

i guess in the sense of my strengths & preferences i really was "born a woman", altho i feel this is said somewhat metaphorically. it is more accurate to say i am a cyborg who adjusted biochemical environment of my sweet bod to better match my character strengths. but i am also a woman. when my E goes high, i go crazy in same pattern of a woman on her cycle or preggers. to understand me you engage me the way u would a cis woman. an E-dominant brainbody.

anyway, fuck off with your jealous misogyny. i am a high achieving female and even if my mate's preferred income bracket makes me "hypergamous", and even if my net worth is negative, fact is i am an extremely valuable partner and object and with honest effort i deserve a solid male. i have no obligation to pursue low achievers and tards like you.

my sinking time and youth into a subpar male would be travesty. i know my worth. that said, i am *by far* not judging on net worth or income. what i am looking for is a male who bends to my willing him to tirelessly improving himself and his skill & stamina at fucking. i am not a consumptive pet. i am an assistant and personal trainer, and spy and geisha, and status item object for display. instead of being an angry impotent male. my transition is honorable as fuck and it's wonderful. i have a WAY better chance of buildingmy dad that retirement cabin (my dream goal).

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by America [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

big part of why i jumped is because my preferred role is support. sort of. i will build my nidalee AD when i need to carry a team. but i'd rather play AP in support of a man. my strength is emotional/psychological, and pain tolerance, and moral support...and manipulation... - not grinding at laser-focus tasks.

anyway, part of it was a practical consideration, yes. my strength is best leveraged presented in a beautiful, hairless package that smells nice. and the way I imagine touching the ceiling of the world is in exceptional loyal service to a good man, elevated to an art form. so yes i tranned partly because i (was) really really gay, and partly because im a " gold digger " (such a thing exists, but so do honorable discerning high-achieving wives).

i guess in the sense of my strengths & preferences i really was "born a woman", altho i feel this is said somewhat metaphorically. it is more accurate to say i am a cyborg who adjusted biochemical environment of my sweet bod to better match my character strengths.

To thine own self, be true.

I believe the ancient egyptians first coined the term, in a much simpler manner with "know yourself".

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That doesnt work for men. Men are still expected to make themselves in this world, but perhaps THAT is why you decided to hop fence to the other side.

You're welcome to come over here at anytime. If you can even make the cut.

I agree though. There's sexism towards men. Especially around economy. Men do need to learn to be more independent and rely less on buying happiness thru a pet female as well. There's alot we can do. Certainly not just one solution.

Making things go back to the 1950s for men and women. Meh. Reducing and coping with sexism won't reduce poverty really much if at all. It'll maybe help society move forward though, minimize the abuse people suffer and help us tackle real problems like. Ahem. Healthcare. Which is already subsidized and socialized substantially health insurance and the hospital industrial complex.
One reason insurers pay so much for procedures n proscriptions is to keep the entire industry afloat otherwise hospitals wouldn't be able to keep the lights on.

A majority of patients in this country are defaulting on medical bills and not paying out. Or recieve care and die. Think of those COPDers whoer perpetually hospitalized on medicare then don't ever pay, then die.

Yeah. It's fucked up.

[Throndor]

Ive never heard of a contemporary politician that platforms on the revocation of women's rights won in first and second wave feminism. I mean, im sure they exist, ive just never had the opportunity to query one so far as to reveal that aim.

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Making things go back to the 1950s for men and women. Meh. Reducing and coping with sexism won't reduce poverty really much if at all. It'll maybe help society move forward though, minimize the abuse people suffer and help us tackle real problems like. Ahem. Healthcare. Which is already subsidized and socialized substantially health insurance and the hospital industrial complex.
One reason insurers pay so much for procedures n proscriptions is to keep the entire industry afloat otherwise hospitals wouldn't be able to keep the lights on.

A majority of patients in this country are defaulting on medical bills and not paying out. Or recieve care and die. Think of those COPDers whoer perpetually hospitalized on medicare then don't ever pay, then die.

Yeah. It's fucked up.

Its all copasetic to conjure wild hairbrained ideas on how we can socialize healthcare entirely, but on the personal level, healthcare challenges can be substantially reduced by proper diet and exercise. The averagr american is morbidly obese. The left likes to conflate this issue with mythical genetic theories regarding thyroid issues, and what not, but this wasnt always the case. Humanity wasn't always morbidly obese, so is the problem genetic?

Moreover, yes, SOME people have thyroid issues, but is this MOST? Or is this a case of normalizing the exception, and exceptionalizing the norm?

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ive never heard of a contemporary politician that platforms on the revocation of women's rights won in first and second wave feminism. I mean, im sure they exist, ive just never had the opportunity to query one so far as to reveal that aim.

It's a goofy political stance you're right.

Ppl who'r wise though can just make sure their orgs are well managed n forward thinking. It's also ridiculous to campaign against.

It's like not something id put on the table at an interview for being boss but once hired id be sure to listen to peoples grievances even if only to reassure or refer them to the appropriate resources. And if necessary get involved on a case by case basis.

I don't like where Democrats took it. Beyond the issues of abortion access and regulation. Not thru government subsidy but so that it can't be fucked with in low class red state legislators and poor marginalized people can continue to access it at a local fair market value. This requires intelligent regulation though. Not bullshit religious liberty and civil rights crap which everyone ignores anyway.

Again. Poor people are a problem that needs to be dealt with. As it's becoming more dangerous and problematic in this country for upstanding responsible citizens to escape the growing hoardes of lowlifes.

[Throndor]

You can only lead the horse to water, though. You cannot force the horse to drink deeply, of the well. Therein lies the crux of the problem.

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can only lead the horse to water, though. You cannot force the horse to drink deeply, of the well. Therein lies the crux of the problem.

Yeah and at somepoint the bureaucracy of filling that trough with clean water becomes too expensive. There's my libertarian bent.

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you can even make the cut.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]