Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2011, 12:35 PM
Uthgaard Uthgaard is offline
VIP / Contributor

Uthgaard's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,451
Default

After going to the sites linked to, it looks to me like the reports of the tunic being more common were cherry picked from a debate over the rarity.
  #2  
Old 04-19-2011, 01:56 PM
Asher Asher is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 677
Default

If it is more proof you want I will get it for you. No matter what question is being debated there will always be people on both sides. A majority of people said the Tunic was common. I know it was for sure because like Origin, I camped it a lot.

Initially the robe came out with the stats it is on our server. Which item you think is better the tunic or the robe? That is why Tunic is more common. When they nerfed the robe they didn't change the rarity and according to the posts on Alla and Monkly it was early Feb 2002.

I will search safe house, afterlife and FoH boards when I have time. If you will consider other dev's thoughts check with them. I am sure at least some of them will remember this. The drop going rare was huge news on all servers at that time.

Asher
  #3  
Old 04-19-2011, 02:10 PM
Asher Asher is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 677
Default

While there is no date listed it shows Tunic as being common:

http://eqdiary.tripod.com/quests/sebdrops.htm

http://www.angelfire.com/freak/eqjon...is/sebilis.htm

http://www.thesafehouse.org/forums/s...ead.php?t=2860

note: I am sure thesafehouse.org used to display it properly but you can see the names of the column headings on the first line and the search for fungus covered and you will see that it would be under the common heading. Article dated Dec 1 2000

Asher
Last edited by Asher; 04-19-2011 at 02:28 PM..
  #4  
Old 04-20-2011, 07:52 PM
Asher Asher is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 677
Default

/bump

if this proof still isn't sufficient please let me know what you are looking for. I don't believe Sony ever said anything officially about it and their new forums started in 2004. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Asher
  #5  
Old 04-20-2011, 08:32 PM
baalzy baalzy is offline
Planar Protector

baalzy's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asher [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
While there is no date listed it shows Tunic as being common:

http://eqdiary.tripod.com/quests/sebdrops.htm

http://www.angelfire.com/freak/eqjon...is/sebilis.htm

http://www.thesafehouse.org/forums/s...ead.php?t=2860

note: I am sure thesafehouse.org used to display it properly but you can see the names of the column headings on the first line and the search for fungus covered and you will see that it would be under the common heading. Article dated Dec 1 2000

Asher
Try using the wayback machine to find snapshots in the 2000ish era of those same pages. That should be able to serve as proof if those sites existed then.
__________________

Baalzy - 57 Gnocro, Baalz - 36 Ikscro, Adra - 51 Hileric, Fatbag Ofcrap - 25 halfuid

Red99
Baalz Less - Humger, Baalzy - Ikscro

If MMORPG players were around when God said, "Let there be light" they'd have called the light gay, and plunged the universe back into darkness by squatting their nutsacks over it.
Picture courtesy of azeth
  #6  
Old 04-20-2011, 08:59 PM
Asher Asher is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 677
Default

Apparently thesafehouse.org has robots.txt configured to not be archived.

All the pages I linked are alive and functional and state that the Tunic was the common. My original post was people discussing it which I understand if the GMs don't accept that. That is why I posted both monkly-business and allakhazam websites even though there was a couple posts saying otherwise.

thesafehouse.org should be a reliable source I would think. I am just waiting to hear back from devs if this is sufficient or what other kind of proof they want.

Asher
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.