![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
|
|||
|
19 y/o sexless males don't need guns. I want a virgin test for firearm ownership. If you've never used your penis on a consenting female you're probably an angry maladjusted fuck who shouldnt own a firearm
More importantly, I don't believe pokesan is Irish. Every Irish American I've ever met is bottom tier IQ and I have a quiet admiration for poke's terse trolling God bless
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | ||
|
|
|||
|
#72
|
||||
|
Quote:
But I'm with you on the yellow horde. The mongols took Iran. They won't take America
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
|
||||
|
#73
|
||||||||||||||
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Columbine High School massacre. (the one that set the precedent for current day hysteria) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
#74
|
||||
|
Quote:
I know you think you’re right I know you and every Democrat think you’re right but we’re not going to sacrifice the bill of rights for legislation that will not stop mass shootings so YOU can feel like you did something. You’re a traitor and part of the rebel alliance. Once again for every unconstitutional idea, there is a constitutional solution that would be just as helpful if not more helpful than these petty unconstitutional laws that you’re talking about that is so easily manipulated and won’t change a thing. All we say over and over again is there are constitutional solutions why do you only think unconstitutional solutions will work? Because you’ve been manipulated. | |||
|
Last edited by mickmoranis; 03-28-2018 at 10:04 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#75
|
|||
|
If liberals wanted to get rid of NRA funding, and we’re actually interested in maintains a free America, they wouldn’t be fighting to take one institution that they don’t agree withs ability to be involved in political donations, they’d be trying to get rid of campaign financing all together. But Hillary even rolled back Obama era limits on funding so she could get more money.
Constitutional: limit campaign funding Unconstitutional: ban only certain organizations you disagree with from campaign funding Political parties are cults and there trying to take over America and change it however they see fit and once they get the guns they’ll be able to do whatever they want | ||
|
|
|||
|
#76
|
|||
|
Patron sorry bout the big eyes thing trying to stay lucid.
Another HUGE reason why that 19 year old stuff is a bad idea is because this: 1. One school shooter in 30 years bought their guns themselves without help from an adult 2. Very rarely do we roll back gun legislation, only once and it was thanks to wording the NRA put in the short sighted assault weapons ban. 3. So when the 19+ non virgin law (I know that but you were joking but hey here’s some More humor for ya) turns out to not work, the left will just move onto the NEXT attack on the second amendment. 4. The strategy is to keep reducing the citizens rights to own guns until they have no right to own one at all. This is a game hard been played for decades. This isn’t a secret most lefty politicians have come out and said this, Diane Dinestine for one. The right for a citizen to bare arms shall not be infringed. The wording is there to prevent incremental dissolving of the second amendement. It was an actual discussion they had while penning it, how to prevent society from instituting unconstitutional law this very way. Hope this helps! Remember for every idea to limit the second amendment that won’t do much, there is a constitutional policy that either won’t do as much or will do more. So to people who want to “do something” why do nothing while you blame others for doing nothing when there is plenty you can do that the left ignores instead to go straight for the guns? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#77
|
||||
|
Quote:
And we don’t even have an economic downturn.... imagine how badly we’d need tonprot car ourselves from that group during an actual economic crash! Try and convince me we don’t need security when our twonleading political parties have become cults?! | |||
|
Last edited by mickmoranis; 03-28-2018 at 10:55 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#78
|
|||
|
I don't feel particularly bad about guns either way. I think the fact that they are so prolific and deadly does make a difference in modern times, however.
It's not like a village of 100 with 100 guns. Over 100 mile areas. We have millions of people with millions of guns all tightly packed in small areas. Ya. Bad stuff will happen. It's just inevitable. It will happen with more frequency. And it will happen less spread out over time. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#79
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by mickmoranis; 03-28-2018 at 11:43 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#80
|
||||
|
Quote:
The difference between the right and the left is, there is a bill of rights that prevents us from doing one thing for very good reasons, that doesnt prevent us from doing the other thing. So when a lib is like, "why do this but not that!" again, it ahs to be said over and over, one is constitutionally protected and the other isnt. I wish libs would just understand this basic reality. To libs I say: LOOK at what you can do to things/people that aren't constitutionally protected, you can literally ban them from entering the country... so START CHANGING things that are not constitutionally protected instead of barking the SAME rhetoric for 50 years, without changing anything while shouting that hopes and prayers does nothing. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|