
04-14-2011, 07:50 PM
|
Orc
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 32
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abacab "The REAL truth"
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Funny you mention that, there was a great ethical debate over journalism involving that program, since media is supposed to be "indifferent" and merely report happenings and fact... "To catch a predator" actually removed journalism from information gathering and moved it into vigilantism which was to be exploited for ratings.
Because of this reason and "intent" being the factor very few convictions were upheld and usually the only indictments came from previous sex offenders which were NOT supposed to use the internet at all, so they ended up violating their parole and being sent back to prison.
But I will agree that "intent" is a gray area which can be interpreted in a multitude of ways. Would intent be merely speaking of the action? Or would it be in the process of performing? If Spok was merely talking about RMT then by the staff they decided this was "intent" but in my view and probably Spok's, intent would be linking to Paypal or dropping moneygram addresses, because at that point it would be "in process" but the crime in question hasn't yet been committed (because the trade would had to have taken place: post facto)
In my opinion things should only be prosecuted or punished based on post-facto and not the idle words and thoughts of the derranged
|
THIS
|
|
|