![]() |
|
#381
|
||||
|
Quote:
As well unintentional violations. Do you think Lord Bob intended to violate the convoluted tracker FTE rule? Or say you're on a COTH mage and you get trained, congratulations you're in violation of tracker FTE! I guess you're greedy for trying to COTH your guild and save some time. Wouldn't expect a very casual/non-raider to understand the scene. All I see here is a lot of wishing that everyone was as virtuous a white knight as you. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#382
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#383
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#384
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, it was stupid. It was a hacked around way of solving a problem. The problem being that variance on a per-mob basis was a bad design idea from the outset, and there weren't programmatic ways of solving the issue. The tracker rule and no camping on bosses aren't the same rule. You could have zero trackers allowed and force players back to the zone in upon repop. Tracking shouldn't even be a thing, as its equivalent to socking. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#385
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#386
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
GMs have just further clarified this rule to expand what a raid spawn location is to basically everything except the zoneline. Through Rogean's clarification, and suspensions to BDA and Lord Bob | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#387
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regardless none of this would exist with variance eliminated in place of quakes & automated succor. No reason not to, aside from the minor disruption to players in the zone. But with advance warning I don't see it as a big deal. Most players on quake are going to be doing something other than exping even in a casual guild. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#388
|
|||
|
The real barrier to entry is not looking as cool as warriors with epics
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#389
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#390
|
|||
|
True but P99 server pop is way higher than any classic. I'm pretty sure there wasn't enough endgame players on live servers to sock through the variance windows
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|