Hey, guys. Let's get back on topic, please.
Why have feminists been quiet about the 1,400 girls abused in Rotherham in the UK who were as young as 11?
From
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rother...tation_scandal
Quote:
In August 2014 the Jay report concluded that an estimated 1,400 children, most of them white girls aged 11–15, had been sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 by predominantly British-Pakistani men.
[snip]
The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing them with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape their mothers and younger sisters, and trafficking them to other towns. There were pregnancies—one at age 12—terminations, miscarriages, babies raised by their mothers, and babies removed, causing further trauma.
|
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why don't feminists speak about Rotherham? It is because that one female accomplice has a feminism-signaling hair-cut, right? That's the only possible reason I can discern from the mugshots.
12-22-2017, 04:22 PM
Threaded Mode