Ninja looted by Zoolex

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by nalkin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The logic behind having a NBG group on an item worth 4k is way worse than the logic behind a druid (with no rings) claiming need on a +STR ring.

It doesn't matter. The logic of doing NBG isn't the debate here. The group had previously established the fact that they would NBG the ring. It was a static condition of the group.

If you're going to defend a druid rolling need on a 10ac, +7 strength ring, I guess that's a matter of opinion. I don't see it. I think it's exceptionally greedy, I'd never do it, and I'd 100% agree with Zoolex if I was in the group when this happened. And as it turns out, the rest of the group does seem to agree with Zoolex. So I guess there's that.