Activists Hold Funeral For Frozen Chicken In Store

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

maslow ranks food more important than feeling selfrighteous

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are plenty of good reasons to eat meat, but you are hardly worth the time.

I'm sorry you feel that way. I've obviously demonstrated that I respect everyone here enough to engage in an adult conversation, so it's disappointing you're unwilling to reciprocate. I guess I'll never know what sparkling gems of insight you might have shared if I had only been worth the time. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lojik]

What about my cats? I love them...should they be vegan?

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by Lojik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about my cats? I love them...should they be vegan?

Eating your cats is not vegan, no. I can't believe you even have to ask.

Have you read a single word of this thread?

[Raev]

This thread is a great example of r/k theory. R-selected people (modern liberals) are optimized for periods of abundance. To maximize your reproductive success in an environment of abundance, you need to fuck a lot and avoid conflict. This ensures you produce the maximum number of children who don't pointlessly injure themselves competing over infinite resources. Meanwhile, K-selected people (modern conservatives) are genetically optimized for periods of scarcity and have the inverse tendencies.

Any sort of conflict or competition or ranking triggers R-selected people, because these people are naturally less evolutionarily fit than their k-selected counterparts, and they know they are the bottom of the barrel. This is why liberals constantly talk about 'XXX for everyone'. Free healthcare. Free education. Participation trophies. Success for all. Don't blame the victim. Anything that involves effort on their part is immoral. What liberals really want is an infinite field of grass with no predators upon which they can reproduce infinitely. Contrast this with the Declaration of Independence, which talks about the pursuit of happiness. The founders, like all ancients, were k-selected. After all, they didn't have nearly infinite food and computers to do all of their annoying tasks for them.

Animal rights are simply another manifestation of these r-selected neuroses. A liberal sees someone killing an animal, and thinks 'oh god, that guy looks dangerous. He is both willing an able to kill that animal; if times get tough that could be me. Let's take away his gun and get him on a high estrogen soy based diet like me, so he won't be a threat' Since they are emotionally incapable of rising to our level, they try to pull us down to theirs with nonsense like 'peoplehood for animals'.

[Pokesan]

eating pussy can't be vegan, you're consuming the secretions of an animal. it's the same as dairy.

the reciprocal is completely vegan however, if you're a prude about it.

you've given me alot to think about.

[Lulz~Sect]

snickers softly

[Mead]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can give you recipes to fulfill your nutritional requirements if that's what you want to pretend your objection is now. I don't take any pills. I mean, any. I haven't needed so much as a Baby Tylenol in like six years. Because I virtually never get sick any more. Because my immune system isn't compromised. But I know you're not really interested in nutrition, so let's not even pretend, k?

Talk about being delusional. Every vegan thinks the same bullshit until they actually get sick. Judging by most of your posts in this thread I think it's safe to say you have no credible medical knowledge. Please prove me wrong if you do.

[Fasttimes]

No veagan diet, no veagan powers.

[Spyder73]

Your arguments are regurgitated crap you have read on the internet. 99% of the population disagrees with what you are saying so if it makes you feel better to place death on a pedestal please continue ranting about how all sentient beings (such as cows, frogs, crocodiles) deserve personhood.

What about homosexuality? What would happen if the entire population decided to go gay? We can have everyone altered at birth. No more hormones facilitating bad pairings, presumably no more domestic violence. With modern advances we could impregnate women and open up baby growing silos where parents who were ready to have a baby could go an adopt one. Just because I prefer women doesn't mean I cant make the hard choice and choke down a d!ck does it? This would solve loads of problems around the world such as unwanted pregnancies, child abuse, population control... only those ready for parenthood would be adopting. This to me is what I hear when I read you spewing about veganism.

Just because an ideal is theoretically possible doesn't make it correct, doesn't make it better than the way we have done it in the past, and it doesn't give spoiled brats who are afforded the privilege of choice the moral high ground. The world has a circle of life and death and honestly I think your lines of criticism are just as arbitrary as the narrative you accuse me of pushing.