Scout Roll Agreement 2017

[Fasttimes]

All that matters is the electoral vote anyways.

[Check12345]

p99
what a server
what a community

a vote of yes is a vote against aids

[Crashking]

Originally Posted by Perissh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Player made agreement cant be made if not all players agree to it. That defeats the whole purpose. If a player made agreement is something that a couple of people can agree on and force everyone else to adhere to, I'm going to start posting some insane agreements and have my friends agree to them.

East Commons Tunnel cannot be used to sell items going forward. All auctions must now be done inside of High Keep in the room behind the banker.

I just have to say 2 things here.... 1: OMG 20 pages already and Goblins of Highkeep post only went 13. And 2: While Highkeep would be nice spot to do trade with since banker is right there and its basically middle of the continent I can only see Highkeep go to hell due to all the people logged in thus causing more lag then needed for the zone -- So much for paradise.

But back to the OP: Um this isn't a discussion.. its a POLL - ie a place to vote if you agree or disagree as those are the only choices. Now there could have been another thread that was more of a discussion thread. So based on what I see, I have to say disagree... Please point out the discussion thread and I'd be happy to discuss other view points. As for selling of MQ's... this should be outlawed period, earn your coppers the old fashion way.... GRIND for them. The whole economy of selling things just makes things worse for the game overall -- it certainly would be a whole different game if you could only sell to or buy from vendor NPCs -- no more 40k+ items, you toon would just have to earn things maybe actually go to the camp and kill for it, sucker others into being social and helping out. No more people coming by to farm something hoping to pawn it off to someone else and instead the spot might actually be open to give another person a shot at said item.

Also as for OP.. hate to say but this is 99 Blue the EQ experiment to 99 Green where GM's might have different rulesets or other things implemented to avoid major issues, like Epic MQ sales where lvl 1 rouges could have it, oh wait they did something about that already. Maybe Rogean/Nilbog will make up a rule against pick pocketing mobs from a camped area ... hmm Don't see anyone discussing that one or bolstering to have something done about it, I mean hey isn't the reason someone normally camps something is for the loots.

Anyway.. where was that discussion thread again regarding ways to deal with scout... eh maybe I should just get back to the game so I can have the right faction to do things when I want to do them.

[Jimjam]

NBG votes will never make it thru the House of Commons (East division).

[Kesselring]

I imagine people voting no aren't voting no because of the roll but because in your clauses they can't roll for their best buds. Imo a roll is good enough than a clickfest. Let people do what they will with their winnings. If they wanna sell it or give it to a friend maybe they should be allowed. Scout isn't like ring 8 where you gotta do a shitty line of quests. Also it's not as long of a wait. I do see what you're getting at by wanting to keep the rollers to people who actually are looting it but that just means as soon as you win you never come back to help. One guy can show up for his first roll ever and win and then never be seen again helping other people with it. Which happens a lot.

[dbouya]

I voted disagree. Because I disagree with this thread. I don't think this is AT ALL WHATSOEVER what sirken had in mind when he said "player agreements."

You can't refer to this poll for the next year, that's not a binding rule. I do agree though. If I were there I'd agree and then roll. Then I'd keep my word. I disagree with this type of thread though. I don't think it's enforceable, because we don't have 807 sticky thread polls.

In fact maybe I shouldn't've voted because this thread is meaningless.

[kb2005]

Voted no coz I don't think players should be able to post a set of rules and expect it to be binding for everyone on the server. This thread trying to set a bad precedent, IMO.

[danzig]

Gonna guess that the last 20 pages contains a lot of people getting more passionate about this issue than they've felt in years.

[aaezil]

Originally Posted by kb2005 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Voted no coz I don't think players should be able to post a set of rules and expect it to be binding for everyone on the server. This thread trying to set a bad precedent, IMO.

I think most sane people echo this sentiment

[jilena]

Voted no as the initial post is far too angsty. I would be fine with a roll but all of the other unnecessary nonsense needs to be stripped out. Yawn.