Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-06-2011, 12:44 PM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well I've answered this far too many times to do it again. A forum search for 'boxing', by me, should yield all types of results.

Daldaen, your argument(?) makes no sense. Completely unrelated topics.
Not related but both against the 'play as a community' mentality. You want people to interact with others but selling characters for plat just encourages people to PL their friends alt account to 50 and sell it.
  #12  
Old 04-06-2011, 12:51 PM
Asher Asher is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not related but both against the 'play as a community' mentality. You want people to interact with others but selling characters for plat just encourages people to PL their friends alt account to 50 and sell it.
One also eats up a lot more server resources. ie: Costs GMs more money and the other has no adverse affect.
  #13  
Old 04-06-2011, 01:04 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not related but both against the 'play as a community' mentality. You want people to interact with others but selling characters for plat just encourages people to PL their friends alt account to 50 and sell it.
It's not just an issue of forced interaction - people are allowed to solo if they want after all. The issue is about actively impeding the ability of others to group where they want, not to mention utterly destroying the raid scene. I know that the raid scene already isn't perfect, but imagine how silly it would be if guilds could legitimately six-box on raids.

As for making another server for boxers, if the devs feel it's not worth their time, that's enough of a reason not to support it.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #14  
Old 04-06-2011, 01:21 PM
Daeminff7 Daeminff7 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
Default

I mean just look at the other servers populations that do allow boxing... even with the boxes they don't come close to P1999. And in this day and age, it is a lot easier to make friends with people in-game who can help you out I feel - hell, just post a LFG in the general chat on this very forum and you will probably get some responses from people who play in your timezone/free-time. Either way, it makes it feel more like what I remember playing back in ~2000 than any other emu server [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #15  
Old 04-06-2011, 01:23 PM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's not just an issue of forced interaction - people are allowed to solo if they want after all. The issue is about actively impeding the ability of others to group where they want, not to mention utterly destroying the raid scene. I know that the raid scene already isn't perfect, but imagine how silly it would be if guilds could legitimately six-box on raids.

As for making another server for boxers, if the devs feel it's not worth their time, that's enough of a reason not to support it.
Fair, just limit to 2 box then? 6 boxing is lame everywhere, when you have a self sufficient group and can poopsock the most desired camps by yourself. But I don't think a 2 box of 2 level 60s could hold crypt or disco or myncoids or any of the desired camps from Kunark that a solo class can't already.
Last edited by Daldaen; 04-06-2011 at 01:28 PM..
  #16  
Old 04-06-2011, 01:58 PM
Vidar Vidar is offline
Fire Giant

Vidar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 547
Default

No boxing ever. and if they made a second server thats going to split the population and ruin the whole thing. Its just an overall bad idea.
  #17  
Old 04-06-2011, 02:06 PM
casdegere casdegere is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 263
Default

I don't think he has really thought it through. He is having difficulty finding groups...today. With boxing allowed, later he will most likely complain about not being able to find a place to XP or never getting a camp he has been after for the past month. It can be boring to only have one toon and camp stuff. You have more to do if 2 boxing and you can single handedly camp certain places. But so can everyone else...
__________________
"Death is certain, life is not."-Unknown
"When in doubt, burn it to the ground!"-Me
  #18  
Old 04-06-2011, 02:32 PM
saucer saucer is offline
Orc


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fair, just limit to 2 box then? 6 boxing is lame everywhere, when you have a self sufficient group and can poopsock the most desired camps by yourself. But I don't think a 2 box of 2 level 60s could hold crypt or disco or myncoids or any of the desired camps from Kunark that a solo class can't already.
How about we just keep it at 1 box per person and call it a day?
  #19  
Old 04-06-2011, 02:58 PM
baalzy baalzy is offline
Planar Protector

baalzy's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,860
Default

If 2 boxing were allowed, I'd do it.

But I'm also okay with it not being possible and it's not so important to me that I'd be willing to fight for it.
__________________

Baalzy - 57 Gnocro, Baalz - 36 Ikscro, Adra - 51 Hileric, Fatbag Ofcrap - 25 halfuid

Red99
Baalz Less - Humger, Baalzy - Ikscro

If MMORPG players were around when God said, "Let there be light" they'd have called the light gay, and plunged the universe back into darkness by squatting their nutsacks over it.
Picture courtesy of azeth
  #20  
Old 04-06-2011, 03:00 PM
Rasah Rasah is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fair, just limit to 2 box then? 6 boxing is lame everywhere, when you have a self sufficient group and can poopsock the most desired camps by yourself. But I don't think a 2 box of 2 level 60s could hold crypt or disco or myncoids or any of the desired camps from Kunark that a solo class can't already.
Think of all of the boring camps that would be perma-locked. You could drop your 2nd box on the AC spawn point, and lock it up forever. You wouldn't do this if you only had 1 box, because you aren't really playing the game, and that would get boring. But you could plop a 50 mage on it, and never move.

Or the Bilge spawn. Or one of the VP key mobs. Or any greenie named camp. You get the idea.
__________________
Rasah - [60 Heirophant]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.