Evergreen State College: Collective Psychosis

[mickmoranis]

I would enjoy what you describe immensely.

Drafts. Nuclear field combat. Queers and Trannies in the military.

It would be glorious.

SAVE THE CHILDREN OF NORTH KOREA LETS DOOO IT

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Rader [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are a progressive, of course you are confused.

I'm right of center on every issue except helping the poor

Hope this helps!

[mickmoranis]

I want to help the middle class by forcing them to join the military so they can realize hopes and prayers aint shit.

[Pokesan]

the real problem is breeders make the laws

[mickmoranis]

I think the real problem is life is ruff but everyone was told it was chill

[Pokesan]

don't go getting paranoid on me now

[maskedmelonpai]

Originally Posted by originalman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this a pretty picture ^^

[entruil]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What do you do about the natural concentration of wealth over time, if there are no means for redistribution? In a capitalist system, the more wealth you have, the better your ability to capture a greater share of all current and newly generated wealth (When a capitalist acquires an asset his ability to acquire more assets increases). For example, Paris Hilton inherits $500 million. All Paris Hilton has to do is hire brilliant minds to manage her wealth and investments. Her chance of losing money to market forces is far smaller than her chance of making money off purchasing profitable businesses and properties, or making safe investments. This requires no labor on her behalf, it is purely her money making money.

Progressive taxation is the only force that acts against this and prevents a small number of people from eventually owning virtually all of society. (The lack of which also being a major contributor to why things have been in the shitter since Reagan)

I don't expect such short-sightedness from you lune... progressive taxation and the redistribution in the form of here take this we will take care of you is exactly what keeps the richer getting richer and the poor get just enough to vote for who gives it to them...

Until we deal with the hidden taxes caused by our now fiat currency and central bank the wealth gap will continue to at least stay the same and this progressive theft and choosing who doesn't get to climb the economic ladder of their own volition and on their own merit also creates a sense of entitlement that does not meld with the tenets of liberty.

While all of this is going on there is massive Social-Engineering in every area imaginable, to what end are we really being lead?

[Lune]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't expect such short-sightedness from you lune... progressive taxation and the redistribution in the form of here take this we will take care of you is exactly what keeps the richer getting richer and the poor get just enough to vote for who gives it to them...

Until we deal with the hidden taxes caused by our now fiat currency and central bank the wealth gap will continue to at least stay the same and this progressive theft and choosing who doesn't get to climb the economic ladder of their own volition and on their own merit also creates a sense of entitlement that does not meld with the tenets of liberty.

While all of this is going on there is massive Social-Engineering in every area imaginable, to what end are we really being lead?

Progressive tax doesn't choose who gets to climb the economic ladder and it doesn't discourage achievement. You've really got to get those two Reagan-era lies out of your head. They were designed to make you work against your own best interest and make you shuck and jive for the people who own you.

Nothing about progressive tax means you have to take it and then give it to Shaguamquisha as a lump sum payment. You invest it in schools, national parks, health care, infrastructure, and all the things that make it easier for people to climb the economic ladder.

Trickle down economics will continue to funnel wealth into the hands of capitalists at the expense of everyone who has to sell their labor to survive (that includes you). There is no market force to end this

Republicans have a responsibility to quit swallowing corporate loads and answer to the middle class on this. Frankly, Democrats can't be trusted not to just tax the shit out of everyone and funnel it to inner-city parasites. And that's assuming they win elections which they don't because of retardation.

We need Eisenhower Republicans back.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Progressive tax doesn't choose who gets to climb the economic ladder and it doesn't discourage achievement. You've really got to get those two Reagan-era lies out of your head. They were designed to make you work against your own best interest and make you shuck and jive for the people who own you.

Nothing about progressive tax means you have to take it and then give it to Shaguamquisha as a lump sum payment. You invest it in schools, national parks, health care, infrastructure, and all the things that make it easier for people to climb the economic ladder.

Trickle down economics will continue to funnel wealth into the hands of capitalists at the expense of everyone who has to sell their labor to survive (that includes you). There is no market force to end this

Republicans have a responsibility to quit swallowing corporate loads and answer to the middle class on this. Frankly, Democrats can't be trusted not to just tax the shit out of everyone and funnel it to inner-city parasites. And that's assuming they win elections which they don't because of retardation.

We need Eisenhower Republicans back.

He woke but Lune woker capitalism is a ded end. Too bad Marx didn't outline how capitalism would die, only that it absolutely would because its unsustainable and it was an eventuality.