Rules Clarification Request

[necro316]

Originally Posted by TheBiznessTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did drakar make a new forum account?

you know that's not a bad theory ya got there gasoline,

will investigate further

[Nyrod]

thank you staff for attempting to moderate this horrible cesspool (the best server ever in the history of emulated pvp servers, thank you) of a community.

try not to get discouraged at having so many people focus all of their pint up rage and lack of emotional intelligence directed at you, the majority of people appreciate your help and presence on here.

just remember, this is literally the 309th stupid guild vs guild squabble and forum lawyer questing and will not matter in the grand scheme of things. also, this is harmless compared to blue.

CYA

[Nyrod]

HAHAHAHAHA ^^^

im. so. sorry.

[necro316]

looks like confirmation to me boys, we got a retard on our hands

[Nyrod]

just because colgate lacks emotional intelligence does not qualify him as retarded. many people never mature emotionally, you wouldnt understand.

[necro316]

yikes

[necro316]

I can't even

I'm going 2 bed u finish wit this bozo, ty cwall

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like some of the new rulings for small group/solo stuff because they work in my favor while I am farming.

But Mass PvP ?? I can see some problems here that need to be clarified, especially with regards to past rulings and the rules not being consistent with what the players have been used to since Velious launched. Changing the dispel rule back to the Amelinda hatchet job doesn't seem like the best idea, since you can dispel something to save for your force and kill it MUCH later. THIS IS NOT BLUE, THERE ARE NO ROTATIONS. THERE IS NO FTE. ITS NOT THEIR MOB. IF YOU CAN PREVENT A MOB FROM BEING KILLED THAT IS PVP.

Why should you need the force RIGHT NOW? That is my biggest issue.

If the dispeller is IN RANGE to be able to be stopped from saving the mob from dying, why shouldn't he be allowed to save it?

Even if you wanted Cylock's rule, The SPIRIT OF HIS OWN RULE would make enforcement action on dispel on a PvP server only legit if the offenders guild/force/team never materialized/doesn't exist at all and the guild he represents never kill the mob, and its obvious that it was being done 100% to prevent the guild from killing it for the grief factor.

That doesn't fly either, because in Force VS Force PvP, by denying raid targets this prevents the enemy from acquiring gear and improving their advantage over the other force.

Dispelling is legitimate PvP as long as they are stoppable by PvP for the aforementioned reasons.

You need to have a summit and think this through, and not just wing it.

Hey Cylock you just got dunked on.

You can dispel a mob to save it for a later raid force that week, it doesn't need to be an immediate engage. There is no FTE, you are really making up some big policy changes that don't seem to fit a PvP server.

Try making some rules that actually fit a PvP server. Also a dispeler who represents a raid force is technically denying PvP equipment and PvP advantages by stopping a raid target from dying with dispel. He is benefiting his entire raid force.

Got anything to say for yourself? Didn't think so. Now go take the Scarface Challenge.













just kidding luv u kid

[Symbioticforks]

Fight for the content you want.

Using one guy to dispel an NPC implies you refuse to fight.

That's about as Blue as it gets.

Using an NPC to whipe an entire raid force to generate free YT's on naked players at various binds, especially with leaderboards currently keeping some players immersed..

Is completely counter to a healthy PvP server.

Causing an intentional EXP is one thing, causing an intentional EXP death on 40 people with one character is another. You're just trollin at that point.

[heartbrand]

Empire never tried Tunare, not because we couldn't kill her (easier than AoW), but because it wasnt worth the time.