![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
August 9th, 2000 The Wurmslayer is now a one-handed slashing weapon. February 21, 2001 The Wurmslayer will now fit in a bag. | |||
|
#12
|
|||
|
![]() it was definitely dual wieldable at launch until later nerfed to primary only.
| ||
|
#13
|
|||
|
![]() Yeah it didn't fit into bags, I remember that.
I used mine as a secondary with a Jarsath Trident. By the time they nerfed the offhand use I believe I had other weapons so I don't remember when that was exactly.
__________________
Dantes Infernus
57th Level Champion of Rallos Zek "Life's short and hard like a body building elf." | ||
|
#14
|
|||
|
![]() http://replay.waybackmachine.org/200...llakhazam.com/
I went under quests for Firiona Vie and just tabbed the dates till "Dragon Scales" is updated with the Wurmslayer. So thats the pre nerfed one. At least you have the date that it was nerfed to tell you how long it was in from Kunark Open to Nerf bat time! | ||
Last edited by Rais; 03-22-2011 at 02:17 PM..
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
![]() Ranger named Covergent on beta was using a Wurmslayer. Dunno his forum name, though.
| ||
|
#16
|
|||
|
![]() k so Wurmslayer will be..
-dual wieldable -non lore -range slottable -larger than giant item When paladins were using this item in Kunark as a piercing weapon, how was their skill determined? EQ later added piercing as a paladin skill in Velious era, I believe it was. I remember I owned one.. but I do not remember if a piercing skill ever increased, or if it used 1hs, yet displayed piercing. | ||
|
#17
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#18
|
|||
|
![]() Why, did you try the quest? It was all working on beta.
| ||
|
#19
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Tektite does not give Tektite-gem for scale quest in Solro temple after handing him two carn gems. (Another way) Only option left is to kill tektite, which I haven't done. (last way) | |||
|
#20
|
|||
|
![]() Tektite gave me the Tektite for carnelians when I did it. Would try again and try to figure out if you handed in wrong somehow. Dunno why it would have been changed, seems one should still be able to get it from him.
Nobody tested the first method, so seems that needs to be fixed. | ||
|
![]() |
|
|