1/3 of Russian population headed to bunkers

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but im no double posting scum

got beef?

[Swish]

The stroganov is strong here comrades

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The stroganov is strong here comrades

You have 14 thousand posts on this forum, do you ever stop and consider that?

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have 14 thousand posts on this forum, do you ever stop and consider that?

im tooling him on posts per day tho, almost up to 8 posts a day. I aspire to reach 10 and claim unanimous victory over forumquest.

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im tooling him on posts per day tho, almost up to 8 posts a day. I aspire to reach 10 and claim unanimous victory over forumquest.

praying for you

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

praying for you

thx im pretty frazzled tbh, its hard to just hit refresh all day n night looking for opportunities to post for weeks on end

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thx im pretty frazzled tbh, its hard to just hit refresh all day n night looking for opportunities to post for weeks on end

You coming up on Tecmos real soon too Azz. I say another 2 weeks tops and you'll advance a slot. How it feel?

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a clever way to look at it.

You're making R Flair look like a fucking dunce in this thread and it's wonderful.

However, I don't think it's accurate to cast the USA as cultivating ISIS victories or benefiting strategically from ISIS in any big-picture way. ISIS is an immense force for instability across the entire region, and instability and unpredictability like that are bad for business. For example, tens of thousands of refugees floating to Italy from the ruins of Libya contributes to the instability of the European economy, whose crash would be devastating to the US, including the US elite.

EU masters clearly like importing refugees for some reason. Deliberate importation of domestic security threats seems to benefit authoritarians. It's not like there was a shortage of people wanting to flood European borders before this conflict; the important thing is that they are being allowed entry.

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's also a stretch to claim this administration was able to plan or mastermind the current trajectory of things in Syria. If that were the case, you wouldn't have had Obama threatening Assad over the use of chemical weapons and then completely reneging on it. That was a blunder no matter how you look at it. Many knew the factions that were responsible for the insurgency in Iraq (many of the fighters came in from Syria) would go out of control once we left, but I don't think anybody predicted that they would come up with something like ISIS that has mass appeal to Muslims.

Didn't this follow the change in Russian footing on Syria? I read this as Obama backing down from an even more aggressive stance with respect to destabilizing Syria when Russia started investing in the conflict, pulling back to just airstriking Syrian forces, but you might be able to prove that perception wrong if my timeline is messed up.

As for stretches -- I don't think it's a stretch to suspect that people providing arms, training, and logistical support to a rebel force in a region already rendered lawless by earlier interference might have intended for said force to succeed. ISIS may exceed their wildest expectations but this is a tried-and-true formula. It will be used to justify another US invasion and occupation, which you are correct will not benefit the United States of America unless we go full Genghis, but there are plenty of foreigners who will benefit and they have a distressingly firm grip on the policy of the United States of America. That's not even mentioning the huge money in defense and surveillance (booz allen, raytheon etc sure, but don't forget every single company in Silicon Valley) that stand to benefit. There are a lot of people and dollars foreign and domestic on the side of the further looting of American coffers in the guise of another dogshit war.

[Daywolf]

meh, there is no good side. Not even a lesser of two evils, just evil. Not speaking of the elections.

As far as Russia, the globalists baited the hook, the bear and it's cubs are being pulled in. That forward momentum is there, and as Russia now goes deep into the run, eventually the bear clamped onto that fish will go in upward momentum and break the water bursting high into the air and try to rain destruction down on it's perceived enemies. The bear along with it's trailing cubs.

It's a war that these globalists want, that they are pushing for. They all smell the collapse of the dollar looming. In fact such a collapse is orchestrated, intentionally. But they misjudged the time frame of it, got bogged down, and it'll collapse before they have achieved world dominance. Because as the dominant power, the globalists can control the creation of the new standard of world currency, to be the controllers of it, and of those to be indebted to it.

As far as for the Don, no he's not a globalist. He's outside of their control and they hate him for it. The thing is he can't fix it, you can't fix something designed to fail (I think he knows that). The system is rigged, head to toe, and nothing is going to stop it from collapsing, as it was designed to do.

It's going to hurt, but nowhere near as bad as if the globalists get what they want, or by trying to out of their desperation. They must have a war, a pretty nasty one, otherwise at the collapse of the dollar (along with the euro) they could be set back generations if they are unable to take control of the creation of a new global currency. Time is running out.

[gunsmith666]

I'm thinking that it might be in Russia's favor not to go to war with the states there debt to gdp is 17% states is 104.7%.597 billion defense buget for the states vs 66billion for Russia. I'd in the very least wait till the world stops believing in the American dollar beafore I'd consider provoking the US into a war.I would also wait for a tech change,states will have a harder and harder time staying at the front of military technology if they have a massive economic collapse

Probably wrong,don't care.