![]() |
|
#51
|
|||
|
yeah apparently you can't splice quotes and copy and paste it anymore.
Too lazy to fix. Cheers | ||
|
|
|||
|
#52
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#53
|
|||
|
What really bugs me is how hill dog attacks donald trump for being a business man in the past. But she ignores all the problems that have been going on while she was steadily involved in government and did nothing to fix those problems.
But now that she is running for president she claims she wants to fix these problems. Not to mention she plays the "My husband" card way too fucking much.
__________________
| ||
|
Last edited by Baler; 09-27-2016 at 12:35 AM..
|
|
||
|
#54
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#55
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#56
|
|||
|
The "proof" that Trump was for the war where he said ".... ya... I guess..." when asked about the war on Howard Stern.
That is technically an affirmation, but elsewhere he was against it. I say what difference does it make what someone without the intel thought about the war. The people who had the real intel like Hillary were for the war. Those who actually believed there was credible intel were rightly for the war. That was most likely the only info the Don had, like the rest of us. Yet he was still dubious on Stern and outright against it according to Hannity and several interviews which took place after the war began. We of course now know there was no credible intel. Chaboo is drinking far too much MSM kool-aid. Hillary looked robotic and scripted in the debate, obv knew the topics in advanced, and Trump still dominated and had more compelling arguments and solutions, even if he struggled to stay on topic. When they got down and dirty, she looked level headed but more wrong than right. Also have to say Trump is dead wrong about using lists like "no-fly lists" or "terrorist watch lists" to remove 2nd amendment rights. These circumvent the constitution without do-process and only offer a foothold towards banning gun-ownership for everyone.
__________________
Pro-Rustler since 1974.
| ||
|
Last edited by R Flair; 09-27-2016 at 12:46 AM..
|
|
||
|
#57
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sorry I said something positive about you Pok3s, I hope I didn't damage your rep here [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#58
|
||||
|
Quote:
Oh and no I don't watch him, I really have nothing to do with Faux, even if he's on there. I just listen to his radio program sometimes. I use to watch him sometimes, but not for years. He delivers better on his radio program though, less tied maybe. But yeah, point stands, they share commonality on many opinions. So you do have issues if Hannity is such a huge joke. That means with everything he has to say, which is also what the Don says. You likely just don't know Hannity's opinion, that's about all I'll give you on this point.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Daywolf; 09-27-2016 at 12:55 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#59
|
||||
|
Quote:
LOL Hannity has Ted Cruz on his show. That's like the Michelle Bochman of the right LOL Again, Trump choked hard on that topic. It was evident, and it was pretty funny. Not as funny though as the " Doesn't have the look", oh! It's Stamina!! LOL | |||
|
|
||||
|
#60
|
|||
|
Feel like Trump lost but honestly tonight was a 2 on 1. Lester Holt may be a registered Republican but I'm calling bullshit on the host considering not one question was posed towards Clinton about her email server, Benghazi, pay to play, etc.
These debates won't be good for Trump. Clinton's an automaton robot of political jargon bullshit. She's been playing this game her entire life. If Trump wants to win or gain ground in the debates he needs to focus on Clinton's corruption and the fact that she's been in politics for 30 years with little to show for it outside of her 125 mil estimated fortune. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|