People of Color are the Enemy, says Maine Gov.

[entruil]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still, Trump's not the perfect candidate, and that's ok, he is a HUGE difference from Hillary. But all the media has is what they can read between the lines, which is nothing.

theory of hillary being a ph and trump being a shill is still alive because gary johnson is the libertarian and ralph nader wasn't mentioned in any new ninja turtles stuff (That im aware of)....

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

theory of hillary being a ph and trump being a shill is still alive because gary johnson is the libertarian and ralph nader wasn't mentioned in any new ninja turtles stuff (That im aware of)....

Johnson is a globalist. Even Ron Paul won't endorse him. It's sad to see how the LP has fallen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Johnson will most likely strip away some dem votes, some neocons too.

Best thing about trump is he's a Nationalist. He's also a populist which I also agree with very much. Clinton is total opposite of these things, she and her ilk ARE the problem, they are the wall-street elites, the globalist elites, the banking elites etc.
You didn't mention Darrell Castle, probably best guy running. But rationally most will be voting for Trump that like Darrell, just like most supported Ron Paul in past elections and were angry the Reps screwed him out of it.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Need I adorn a tin foil hat for this answer? Did the Pleiadians fund him by chance? I know, you are going to bring up the Koch brothers, but that was done recent and as a private event by one of them. Koch did that on his own to support the Don, how is that bad for the Don? It'd be better if all of the repubs got off their high horses and supported the Don. How would that be a bad thing? For Hillary, sure, a real bad thing.

I mean like my above posts, what am I saying? I'd MUCH rather be seeing Rand up there doing this, really would. But hey, I've found nothing bad about Trump, and believe me I started my searching for dirt early on the guy debating out him vs that idiot Cruz who turned up dirty as [insert expletive]. All there is is this false narrative being produced by the left, where they pretty much make shit up on the fly and hope their readers/viewers don't take the time to really look. Still, Trump's not the perfect candidate, and that's ok, he is a HUGE difference from Hillary. But all the media has is what they can read between the lines, which is nothing.

I'd like to see your dirt on Cruz. Beyond the fact that he looks like a complete phony while speaking publicly and that he didn't follow up with his pledge to back the gop nominee, I don't really remember much of the dirt on him that people claim. People like to claim he was some establishment dude, but his voting history clearly says otherwise. What exactly is he guilty of?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd like to see your dirt on Cruz. Beyond the fact that he looks like a complete phony while speaking publicly and that he didn't follow up with his pledge to back the gop nominee, I don't really remember much of the dirt on him that people claim. People like to claim he was some establishment dude, but his voting history clearly says otherwise. What exactly is he guilty of?

Hard to go by his voting history when he wasn't voting for long. No I don't point to that, there isn't really anything pro or con there to establish. He was there long enough to basically back his run for president, much in the same way 0bama approached it. Not saying they are directly comparative, just that they both did the same and used the short term position to vault themselves into the race.

Well, especially between Blitzers and myself, we had a lot of long winded debates over the two here early this year, Trump and Cruz. And from the beginning, I was fine with either of them. But as I did my research that began to change.

I don't know, you want some short points? He worked for Bush, was the Bush lawyer for the recount election in Florida, neocon Bush owes his win bigtime to this man, he's not some "outsider". His senate campaign run was off of a loan from goldman sachs, of which his wife worked for and is also a member of the CFR in all the bad ways. He has problems with the FEC for how he has handled his donations. He was born in Canada, is a Canadian citizen, and from a time when it was illegal in Canada to hold a dual citizenship; the US citizenship would have had to haven been denounced (100% ammo for the dems). Then he was all for the people, but supported voterless elections, which is just repulsive. Then even at RepCon, he thought he could just walk in and steal the nomination, which he tried, but his new neocon friends (or old) left him out to dry.

We heavily debated most of those points here plus many many more. Glad it's over.
https://youtu.be/VLkbx5U7EVU
https://youtu.be/v75wCTMZoSY

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

same thing. who do you think bankrolled trump's campaign?

man that's bullsheedo.

her father put in more work than a lot of guys to be where he is.

[phacemeltar]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

man that's bullsheedo.

her father put in more work than a lot of guys to be where he is.

such naivety, zero skepticism. i just deleted a huge post i made because i know youre just going to argue with a poop joke.

you guys are so unimportant, i'd be wasting my time trying to explain my point.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

such naivety, zero skepticism. i just deleted a huge post i made because i know youre just going to argue with a poop joke.

you guys are so unimportant, i'd be wasting my time trying to explain my point.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
others can testify if the argument is legit it gets taken to school. they don't call me ATG for nothing.

But you? You had nothing.

[phacemeltar]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
others can testify if the argument is legit it gets taken to school. they don't call me ATG for nothing.

But you? You had nothing.

by huge i mean 3 sentences. that was until i realized that there is no proof on the internet of this corruption (that i have yet to find). it would be a waste of my time to try and change your bias, not gona try.

use your brain a little bit, maybe dont just repeat things you have read.

heres a story about trump's rise to riches: http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ad-at-all.html

im not sure of the source, but this isnt the first ive seen this story. communist russia would profit from having an insider in the u.s. presidency, but im sure youll argue that its all coincidence.

[phacemeltar]

com·mu·nism - a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.

stupid americans, they laugh in your face

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

/ike-didn-t-like-trump-s-dad-at-all.html

Oh boy! Are we going to play the double-standard mini-game here on Forumquest now?
"Dreams of My Father" lol

While one guys Father was questioned and went nowhere, the other is a total psychopath. But hey, can't stick that on Barack Hussein 0bama, because ... that'd be rasis? But the Don, requires a full flogging for the accusations brought up against his Father. That was some crazy ass'd hit piece there, boy! from the daily BEEEAST! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Next we should play the forum game "how far left can we go with our links, and still keep our sanity" ✓