Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 08-14-2016, 06:58 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"safety lights are for dudes". sure, liking Ghostbusters: Class Struggle Edition is being blind to gender.

Never said an all-female cast is a fundamental problem. The problem is that the director and producers were clearly using gender politics for a marketing angle instead of worrying about making a decent movie. You can accuse me of being a sexist for not deliberately lobotomizing myself and ignoring the obvious because you heard on TV that it's more important to virtue signal about being "gender blind" than to be a functional human if you want.

How insulting it is to the audience to assume they are more concerned with dogshit Marxist politics than seeing a decent film when they go to purchase a ticket. But hey, that's how stupid these fucks believe the mass of humanity is. That is how much contempt they have for human life.

The failure of this movie is actually a pretty damn good sign. Indicates that the reach of gender d&c brainwashing is significantly weaker than estimated by the (((executives))) at Sony -- executives that are intimately plugged in to deeper talmudic concerns, if you recall the email leak. Chink in the armor.
It was rather cynical of the execs to attempt that kind of marketing scheme, and the market might be an indicator that what is rampant on the internet or voiced by a younger generation isn't where the mean of society actually is. Whether or not such plans will continue has yet to be seen and doubtful because of the data that Ghostbusters has provided. I also think that Melissa McCarthy's run is up becuase she's the same character and somehow was given the John Candy career path when she has way less talent.
__________________
  #72  
Old 08-14-2016, 07:53 PM
AzzarTheGod AzzarTheGod is offline
Planar Protector

AzzarTheGod's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sullon Zek
Posts: 7,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
. I also think that Melissa McCarthy's run is up becuase she's the same character and somehow was given the John Candy career path when she has way less talent.
Big studio wise, it only takes 1-2 major flops (usually just one) to cut your fee by half.

What happens is her run isn't "done" as much as the star refuses to accept a lower fee and keeps trying to get bids on scripts from any studio.

I have looked into this heavily. Stars both new and old live and die in Hollywood according to what they are willing to accept.

Many of the Twilight cast are prime examples of this, as we have a slew of financial data on the stars themselves that has been disclosed, and their subsequent demands following Twilight.

Taylor Lautner was done by it, as was Ashley Greene. They were trying to get up to 5 million and Taylor Lautner was trying to command 7.5 million for a comedy lead. Hollywood froze him out and he refused to lower his fee. Same with Greene.
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx

PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek
Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82
  #73  
Old 08-14-2016, 08:08 PM
R Flair R Flair is offline
Planar Protector

R Flair's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rustlemania
Posts: 1,058
Default

Spy was probably the funniest movie of 2015, so I don't think another flop is going to end things for Melissa. Someone like her is going to have limited opportunities because not everyone has a sarcastic fat chick role to fill. Not really her fault when movies just don't work out.
__________________
Pro-Rustler since 1974.
Last edited by R Flair; 08-14-2016 at 08:10 PM..
  #74  
Old 08-14-2016, 08:47 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Big studio wise, it only takes 1-2 major flops (usually just one) to cut your fee by half.

What happens is her run isn't "done" as much as the star refuses to accept a lower fee and keeps trying to get bids on scripts from any studio.

I have looked into this heavily. Stars both new and old live and die in Hollywood according to what they are willing to accept.

Many of the Twilight cast are prime examples of this, as we have a slew of financial data on the stars themselves that has been disclosed, and their subsequent demands following Twilight.

Taylor Lautner was done by it, as was Ashley Greene. They were trying to get up to 5 million and Taylor Lautner was trying to command 7.5 million for a comedy lead. Hollywood froze him out and he refused to lower his fee. Same with Greene.
Hollywood business. She might take less to stay active which would be smart. Over saturation is a problem, but actors only have so long to make their money which has to be capitalized on. The Twilight folks asking that much is laughable tho'. The project they were on was bigger than their talents merited post-Twilight which is what it sounds like they're dealing with. Hell, Orlando Bloom has done what else beside LOTR and Pirates?
__________________
  #75  
Old 08-14-2016, 08:55 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Spy was probably the funniest movie of 2015, so I don't think another flop is going to end things for Melissa. Someone like her is going to have limited opportunities because not everyone has a sarcastic fat chick role to fill. Not really her fault when movies just don't work out.
I can see that, but Spy was terrible. She seemed to be the only interested cast memeber while everyone else was just getting a check to help her. She's definately been niched into that character role, but it doesn't last long. Not gonna fault her for getting dat pay do.
__________________
  #76  
Old 08-14-2016, 09:10 PM
entruil entruil is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,273
Default

Tryin' to get my mind straight... is this an affirmative-action thread or what?
  #77  
Old 08-14-2016, 10:58 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Tryin' to get my mind straight... is this an affirmative-action thread or what?
Or what.
__________________
  #78  
Old 08-14-2016, 11:20 PM
entruil entruil is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,273
Default

neat. thx ren/stimpy.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.