Munich Mall Shooting -

[barrettdc1]

Originally Posted by Domo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

some people freak out from time to time, and its a good thing that weapons arnt so easy to get.

Sure you can kill someone with a knife or a hammer, but not as easy as with a gun.

Drunk people on street are pretty common in europe, and some are agro and try to start a fistfight with a cow or something. I dont wanna know how our country would look like when those weekend-rednecks would have access to guns.

I understand that the constitution is a very imporant historcial "item" of the USA, but could it be that some of ther rules writen ther dont really apply to the 21 century anymore?

Someone who is trained and disciplined with a firearm isn't likely to get drunk and pick a fight with a cow. That sounds like some fucking retard that would do that. Point is, is if there was someone in that McDonalds who was carrying they could have shot the fucking asshole before he shot more kids in the face.

No, I'm not talking about giving EVERYONE a handgun and calling it a day. You should have to go through proper training to be able to carry a gun. Imagine though, a population of trained civilians carrying firearms for protection. Might make these cunts that commit these atrocities think twice about carrying out whats in their head. If not, they could be swiftly dealt with on the scene, instead of people dying waiting for the police.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by barrettdc1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Someone who is trained and disciplined with a firearm isn't likely to get drunk and pick a fight with a cow. That sounds like some fucking retard that would do that. Point is, is if there was someone in that McDonalds who was carrying they could have shot the fucking asshole before he shot more kids in the face.

No, I'm not talking about giving EVERYONE a handgun and calling it a day. You should have to go through proper training to be able to carry a gun. Imagine though, a population of trained civilians carrying firearms for protection. Might make these cunts that commit these atrocities think twice about carrying out whats in their head. If not, they could be swiftly dealt with on the scene, instead of people dying waiting for the police.

A 'poll tax' on the right to bear arms. Interesting idea.

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by Domo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

some people freak out from time to time, and its a good thing that weapons arnt so easy to get.

You mean like automobiles?

[Ragnaros]

Serious question, lets say guns were illegal in the USA... what do you expect to change?
Less shootings? cmon lets be real dawg

[Domo]

Well, I am glad that we have strict gun laws, and you are happy that your country dont have any gun laws, so we are both happy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Domo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont wanna know how our country would look like when those weekend-rednecks would have access to guns.

They do have access and are more likely to have guns than anyone else except for inner city criminals ^^ Sadly, the drunk cow brawlers are not the ones who generally kill people :/ Most gun violence in the US is perpetrated in inner-cities in conjunction with other crime. Mass shootings in the US account for a small percentage of total gun violence, but are generally limited to a very specific group: crazy socially inept young white males. Islamism has only recently started competing with that group in the US.

There is no issue with gun ownership among normal people. Its crazies and criminals- neither of whom follow laws-that one must worry about.

[Ragnaros]

Someone who is going as far as to commit to a mass shooting, likely isnt going to let legal boundaries stop them lol
facts

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by barrettdc1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Someone who is trained and disciplined with a firearm isn't likely to get drunk and pick a fight with a cow. That sounds like some fucking retard that would do that. Point is, is if there was someone in that McDonalds who was carrying they could have shot the fucking asshole before he shot more kids in the face.

No, I'm not talking about giving EVERYONE a handgun and calling it a day. You should have to go through proper training to be able to carry a gun. Imagine though, a population of trained civilians carrying firearms for protection. Might make these cunts that commit these atrocities think twice about carrying out whats in their head. If not, they could be swiftly dealt with on the scene, instead of people dying waiting for the police.

The people of Switzerland agree. Nearly everyone has a state issued rifle at home and yet no mass shootings or drunken rampages. Wonder why.

[Domo]

Serious question, lets say guns were illegal in the USA... what do you expect to change?
Less shootings? cmon lets be real dawg

1. I think it would take 5-10 years till 90% of all guns were destroyed hehe.
2. We all know ther would be less shootings.

People would still go nuts from time to time and even kill others with a car, tank, plane, knife or whatever. But overall ther would be less deaths thats for sure.

Ask some people "if you would have to kill someone, which weapon would you choise? a knife, a hammer or a gun?" We all know that most of us would choise a gun. Its fast, its easy, its "clean".

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Ragnaros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Serious question, lets say guns were illegal in the USA... what do you expect to change?
Less shootings? cmon lets be real dawg

Well, I would think there would be less shootings, but the question is how much? And how much would other crime increase if criminals no longer feared being shot for breaking and entering? I would think rural crime would shoot up with removal of that deterrent.