Nag's Lair, Royals Camp

[Taysh]

Originally Posted by mr_jon3s [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you look at https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=132299 The play nice Policy in the second point it talks about this.

That being said, you can absolutely "camp" mobs, and you cannot steal another players 'camp'. In general, if the placeholder or placeholders for a spawn are being killed, that 'camp' can be considered held by the player doing the killing so long as they are keeping the placeholders cleared. You do not necessarily need to be at the spawn point to call it 'claimed' while it is uncontested, however, if someone else wishes to contest the 'camp' you do need to return to the 'camp' and maintain a presence at or very near the spawn(s) in order to hold it. It should also be noted that if you camp out or leave the zone, you have forfeited a camp. You cannot hold multiple 'camps' if another group wishes to contest one that you are holding. The player holding multiple 'camps' retains the right to choose which 'camp' to give up.

THank you this was very knowledgeable!

[JackFlash]

This would be great except royals has always been considered one camp as far as I can remember. I'm sure you can't wait to plop down in king and cite this rule.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Rivthis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When did you jump onto this bandwagon, thought it was always join red will solve your problems

Are you not in the mood for something fresh?

[Erazmus]

Originally Posted by Taysh

I just wanted to know BY GM RULING what the rules were here, not by player based "theory."

Originally Posted by Taysh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I was curious of what the general population believed.

I am confused...

[Taysh]

Originally Posted by Erazmus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am confused...

Right, I wanted to know what People think, compared to what an actual GM ruling is.
I won't follow some theory a person creates, I will follow what the GM states though. But with that being said, no GM has responded, and I got all 3 items I was there for so, win win situation for all I guess.
That's all I mean.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you not in the mood for something fresh?

teams would be pretty dope, discord much less so

green99 won't happen while DBG exists

[TheFaceless]

making more friends I see.

[Kaight]

Originally Posted by Taysh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wanted legit 1 mob with a cheap item, that I could not find for sale for hours. SO i decided to come camp it ...

Griefing a legit exp group over a camp for a cheap item you were too impatient to wait to buy or come back when the camp was open. And the rest of the server is greedy... k.

[Rygar]

You guys know OP is the monk who got banned / suspended for Ninja looting a T-Staff in KC right? His posts make him seem like he's always the victim. I smell more than meets the eye here.

[Taysh]

Originally Posted by Kaight [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Griefing a legit exp group over a camp for a cheap item you were too impatient to wait to buy or come back when the camp was open. And the rest of the server is greedy... k.

Gm ruled that I WAS INDEED Allowed to hold one point, without a physical presence, and I offered to feed them extra EXP, and I let them have targin, which they wanted.

So yes, actually 1 camp trying to hold 3 spots is Greedy, especially when I offered them all kinds of extra help and pulls.

DOn't talk to me anymore, please, ever again. Thanks.