Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-09-2016, 07:07 PM
Blitzers Blitzers is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,051
Default

Your point?
  #22  
Old 06-09-2016, 07:14 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Complexity in a system doesn't mean the game can't be simple. Your average gamer argument has no relevance... Something can be very unpopular and still have lots of possibilities. smh It's really hard to talk to you when you can only think though a 2 part system [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Go away kiddo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Your point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Priceline [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #23  
Old 06-09-2016, 07:35 PM
Blitzers Blitzers is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Complexity in a system doesn't mean the game can't be simple. Your average gamer argument has no relevance... Something can be very unpopular and still have lots of possibilities. smh It's really hard to talk to you when you can only think though a 2 part system [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Go away kiddo.
Obviously you lack the ability to comprehend basic English.

Sony introduced Landmark the more complex end of EQNext before they built a core audience to play the actual game "EQNEXT." I'm not talking about systems and engines you dope. I'm specifically talking about game mechanics and how to build a large enough player base so you can expand into more complex content. Sony wanted free labor, and when they saw their free labor produce shit because the mechanics were too tedious and complex they nixed the end project and sold their pile of shit.

End of story
  #24  
Old 06-09-2016, 08:08 PM
Blitzers Blitzers is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,051
Default

Alarti
Seriously you need to stop taking every fucking comment so damn literal. Was their possibilities within Sony's pile of shit yes, they just fucked it up from the start with they way they chose to roll it out.

Calm down snapper head, not everything said on video game forums are declarations of War.
  #25  
Old 06-09-2016, 08:51 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Obviously you lack the ability to comprehend basic English.

Sony introduced Landmark the more complex end of EQNext before they built a core audience to play the actual game "EQNEXT." I'm not talking about systems and engines you dope. I'm specifically talking about game mechanics and how to build a large enough player base so you can expand into more complex content. Sony wanted free labor, and when they saw their free labor produce shit because the mechanics were too tedious and complex they nixed the end project and sold their pile of shit.

End of story
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Alarti
Seriously you need to stop taking every fucking comment so damn literal. Was their possibilities within Sony's pile of shit yes, they just fucked it up from the start with they way they chose to roll it out.

Calm down snapper head, not everything said on video game forums are declarations of War.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Priceline [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #26  
Old 06-10-2016, 11:55 AM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

let's hear some consumer testimony!

https://forums.daybreakgames.com/lan...-refund.57278/

Quote:
After waiting 2 hours because your game was broke for many all the spots i was hoping to get are gone, basically those few who could get in locked up the spire spots with the unfair advantage of having 2 hours ahead of those who could not get in. I expect a refund close to 400 dollars for the outlay i put into this game.
Quote:
lucky you i still cannot get in. (I am not great with going into files so all those people are screwed big time. Amazing that after over 2 years they cannot just make a steam launcher work. Beyond Pathetic.
Quote:
I've spent over $6,000 on Trove since the beginning of it's alpha... that really crept up on me lol. Spent about $3,000 on Shroud of the Avatar.
  #27  
Old 06-10-2016, 12:56 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
let's hear some consumer testimony!

https://forums.daybreakgames.com/lan...-refund.57278/
Lol an unfair advantage? An advantage to do what?
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.