Mcgregor

[compulsion]

Originally Posted by fan D [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

connor has very good ground game, nate is just amazing and he rocked connor

Conor, with 1 N Conor, has fought 2 total fighters with what would be called good ground games.

Chad Mendes cut ~15 lbs in 3 weeks and had no camp, yet battered McGregor for 2 rounds until gassing badly. Still, McGregor toughed it out and ended up with the KO when Mendes couldn't even lift his arms.

And then the Diaz fight where his ground game looked like shit and he lost.

That is the picture of his ground game. It isn't "very good", at best it is still a big question mark even in the minds of other fighters and experts. At worst, he has no wrestling and needs to get some sub defense advice from Holly Holm.

Idiots like you were the ones eating up the McGregor v. Lawler hype a week ago. Diaz is an attrition boxer with nearly half of his fights determined by decision, he isn't "amazing" and he still beat up McGregor standing.

Originally Posted by Rekrul [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're an idiot parrot of every mma forum that jumps from conclusion to conclusion.

You are half right. I am citing the conclusions of the vast majority of the MMA media and the podcasts of a few current and former UFC fighters. That is called news.

The MMA forums are largely filled with the same garbage as the first 5 pages of this thread. A bunch of people making excuses that their favorite fighter of the last 3 months came out and looked absolutely mediocre.