What is gender REALLY?

[ronasch]

Originally Posted by Liegezen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Completely missed the point though, mang. It's not that all bible thumpers are violent, it's that if it isn't supported in the bible than it's considered complete nonsense and they won't have any of it.

What is it your referring to as "it" that is not supported?

[Liegezen]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

don't even get me started on atomic "science". The only validation we have are the a-bomb and nuclear reactors, both products of Jewish mysticism never independently replicated based on their claimed underlying principles. Every instance of these items existing can be tied directly to involvement in the Judaic cult and the sale of the power of its occult teachings. You really think zog puppet USA just happened to get the bomb at the perfect moment to guarantee Israel's existence out of the coincidental march of science?

As below so above, as above so below. We aren't made up of atoms orbitted by electrons and we don't ride on a planet orbitting the sun. NASA is a sham, the standard planetary model is idiotic (IF physics worked as claimed, planets would be orbitting as they chase the sun through space as it orbited something else, not just going in circles around a stationary star).

All of these ideas are invented as a didactic tool, to reinforce a nihilistic and helpless worldview and cheapen life and make you feel small, all to stop you seizing your destiny as a child of Christ and center of His universe.

The very existence of physics-bending jew mysticism repudiates everything you think you know about a universe based on cause and effect and understood rationally. Satan doesn't care about your neat and tidy little explanations.

Go ahead and tell me I'm trolling again buddy. I'll be that little voice of doubt as you try to sleep tonight.

Can i get some of the weed you're smoking though? for real.

Troll.

[James_Joyce]

Originally Posted by Liegezen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can i get some of the weed you're smoking though? for real.

Troll.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

weird this doesnt look like the nasa / public school version of planetary motion yet it makes infinitely more sense

oh right, im a troll disregard

[Liegezen]

Proof please. Without using any other information or experiment done by anybody else in the world, other than yourself.

Or i guess i can assume you made this model using self gathered information?

[sOurDieSel]

Originally Posted by Furniture [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It was still OK to hate gay people and trannys during velious era so lets try to keep it classic please.

[James_Joyce]

Originally Posted by Liegezen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Proof please. Without using any other information or experiment done by anybody else in the world, other than yourself.

Or i guess i can assume you made this model using self gathered information?

i'm not saying this is a valid model you nimrod, I'm just showing you what it would look like if gravity and planetary motion of spherical bodies worked as they are generally claimed to.

If a gif that adheres to the consensus mathematical model appears so inconsistent with what you've been taught about cartoon physics and astronomy that you are literally arguing against it in your post, what is your beef with me? we on the same side fam.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Liegezen

I'm sorry i hurt your "feelers"

It's k tho, you guys are good fun.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Liegezen]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i'm not saying this is a valid model you nimrod, I'm just showing you what it would look like if gravity and planetary motion of spherical bodies worked as they are generally claimed to.

If a gif that adheres to the consensus mathematical model appears so inconsistent with what you've been taught about cartoon physics and astronomy that you are literally arguing against it in your post, what is your beef with me? we on the same side fam.

Still gotta be fair, i was never really arguing anything other than the stupidity that is people going full cry baby because they have a dick and someone refers to them as a man. I referenced the Bill Nye VS Ken Ham debate because, whether you believe the evidence he provides or not, is how this thread was progressing.

Then it just became fun to keep it going, cuz ya know, why not?




Still want some of that weed though.

[James_Joyce]

Originally Posted by Liegezen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still gotta be fair, i was never really arguing anything other than the stupidity that is people going full cry baby because they have a dick and someone refers to them as a man. I referenced the Bill Nye VS Ken Ham debate because, whether you believe the evidence he provides or not, is how this thread was progressing.

Then it just became fun to keep it going, cuz ya know, why not?




Still want some of that weed though.

so i trolled you into admitting you don't understand how planetary motion works, and now you're trying to backpedal

gg yellowtext achieved $100/8th for u

[Liegezen]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so i trolled you into admitting you don't understand how planetary motion works, and now you're trying to backpedal

gg yellowtext achieved $100/8th for u

What thread you reading?

I started arguing something, then changed to something entirely different for fun. Not backpedaling at all.

But the whole "HAHAH YOU STOPPED THAT MEANS I WIN" mind set is classic.