Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:44 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

Right, BDA decided other guilds were undeserving of pixels, because reasons.

The battle for BDAs soul ended when the rotation fell. Tiggles won.
  #52  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:44 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

I am not a fucking ginger!! That shit needs to stop.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #53  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:46 PM
Exmo Exmo is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right, BDA decided other guilds were undeserving of pixels, because reasons.

The battle for BDAs soul ended when the rotation fell. Tiggles won.
Pretty sure the decision was that guilds were equally entitled to Pixels, not more so because they splintered and carried more than 1 tag to hold multiple places in the rotation. But Good try, Keke.
  #54  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:46 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,709
Default

met Chest IRL, confided in me he uses just for men to escape gingerism

100% in the closet ginger
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #55  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:50 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exmo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure the decision was that guilds were equally entitled to Pixels, not more so because they splintered and carried more than 1 tag to hold multiple places in the rotation. But Good try, Keke.
Which guilds splintered? Huh?
  #56  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:51 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

Wait, are you referring to Omni, the BDA splinter guild?
  #57  
Old 12-24-2015, 06:57 PM
Juevento Juevento is offline
Sarnak

Juevento's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wait, are you referring to Omni, the BDA splinter guild?
My Omni alt got so many pixels it was amazing. All the big guilds had alt guilds in the rotation. TMO had Asgard, IB had Indignation, BDA had Omni, Azure Guard had Europa, etc, etc.
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>

Juevento - Druid <Free Agent>
  #58  
Old 12-24-2015, 07:08 PM
ArumTP ArumTP is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 402
Default

[QUOTE=Exmo;2149105]Not that I really give a shit about the rotation that ended a When it finally ended, I believe a lot of the root cause was that All the Smaller guilds wanted to not lose their turn when they couldn't field a force, but still keep separate spots in line when they could, Be able to combine and uncombine at will and still each have their own spot on every mob's rotation.[quote]

Yeah and? During this period of time BDA regullary pulled in 2x-3x as many players as the smaller guilds. They were better able to kill mobs in those off hours. BDA's complaint was that their were able to get more shots on a mob, but consistently ignores the fact as a combined force they would as a guild get less loot. BDA kills trakanon, they would get 2 BP, bunch of teeth and spells. Combined guilds would get maybe a tooth or 2, a BP for another, and some spells for another. Yes the guilds were better off as they could consistently get a kill done, but were rewarded for less loot for their efforts.

BDA has always had some type of seething hatred for guilds that work together for loot.

Quote:
BDA Offered to continue the rotation on terms that required guilds to be able to field a force to be on rotation for a specific mob. And that didn't work for a bunch of the small guilds who wanted to form at will single target alliances so they could get more mobs. So they rejected the deal and broke off Negotiations. Even after BDA Extended the deadline several times.
We all saw the posting by pint when this all came to light to the server on what those "negotiations" were about. It was a heavily flawed ultimatum joke of a document. Filled with ridiculous tiers, and the ability to kill mobs in off hours when the smaller guilds would likely have nobody online. I explicitly remember that a guild would have to kill gorenaire solo to have a shot at maestro. That document was created just to be rejected by the smaller guilds and make them look like the bad guys.
__________________
Arum Cleric
Ticklebottom Warrior
Servilius Rogue
  #59  
Old 12-24-2015, 07:14 PM
captnamazing captnamazing is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 1,481
Default

the ginger finally cracks
  #60  
Old 12-24-2015, 07:21 PM
Nibblewitz Nibblewitz is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArumTP [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah and? During this period of time BDA regullary pulled in 2x-3x as many players as the smaller guilds. They were better able to kill mobs in those off hours. BDA's complaint was that their were able to get more shots on a mob, but consistently ignores the fact as a combined force they would as a guild get less loot. BDA kills trakanon, they would get 2 BP, bunch of teeth and spells. Combined guilds would get maybe a tooth or 2, a BP for another, and some spells for another. Yes the guilds were better off as they could consistently get a kill done, but were rewarded for less loot for their efforts.

BDA has always had some type of seething hatred for guilds that work together for loot.



We all saw the posting by pint when this all came to light to the server on what those "negotiations" were about. It was a heavily flawed ultimatum joke of a document. Filled with ridiculous tiers, and the ability to kill mobs in off hours when the smaller guilds would likely have nobody online. I explicitly remember that a guild would have to kill gorenaire solo to have a shot at maestro. That document was created just to be rejected by the smaller guilds and make them look like the bad guys.
And in its final iteration (something Pint didn't show you, wonder why) we decided to just do a test run without tiers and qualifying mobs, but the sticking point was allying for one meant you allied for all. The guilds that were allying and dodging lockouts within the rotation couldn't accept this compromise.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.