![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
But that's all just opinion. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#22
|
|||
|
There is no defensible argument for Humans except that of personal taste (cosmetic). Iksars are superior in every way statistically. The human superior ratio fists are a joke, as epic makes Human and Iksar fists 9/16, and even Kunark weapons (much less Velious) blow away non-epic fists.
Iksars should have been better balanced to account for their strengths. For example, imagine if Iksars had a STR or STA hard cap of 200, or slightly lower weapon skill caps than humans. You could balance Iksar Necromancers the same, with a 200 INT hard cap. The choice would then at least be more debatable. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
24% exp penalty is no joke. That's a pretty hefty balance.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
But irrelevant at 60. For a min/maxer that isn't a valid penalty.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will> Manowarr - Druid Blue Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA> Shiroe - 60 Enchanter Manowarr - 60 Druid | ||
|
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
A lot of people started their Monks before Kunark when Iksar wasn't even an option. Other people just think Humans look better, and that matters to them more in how they enjoy their EQ hobby than being more powerful.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#26
|
||||
|
Quote:
Given today's 20/20 hindsight, it's pretty clear that Iksar's racials are OP for Necros and Monks. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#27
|
|||
|
faction doesn't work here like it did on live; you can become ally with all of those as an iksar, whereas i don't think it was possible to raise your faction above a certain point with many places
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#28
|
|||
|
Honestly, I just enjoy the human monk over the Iksar monk. It's not a great argument, but I love my human monk.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#30
|
|||
|
I know a few human monk players who play a human because it's what they played on Live. Yeah, they miss out on a few things. I chose Iksar myself because Iksar.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|