RMTers discuss P1999 dsetup.dll "includes some NSA-level intrusive scans on your PC" - Page 7

Pokesan · #61 10-20-2015, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

simp403, you fell for my troll. just sayin.

that was epic. epic for the win!

fuck you

Ostros · #62 10-20-2015, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

fuck you

Soar · #63 10-20-2015, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nastinate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Most of you guys care more about PP/lewts then your bank account info, so the points moot.

Best post on this whole thread.

AzzarTheGod · #64 10-20-2015, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secrets [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty much, a DLL can do all of that. But his doesn't that is the key.

It'd set off AVs and then some. And not just on runtime; it only sets off AVs on runtime because it's packed with Themida. If it was sending your bank information or recording keystrokes you figured someone would've picked that up by now.

To be fair, most of your replies in this thread as well as the official explanation are NSA-level in response to the Snowden revelations.

You and the staff have provided some good insight, and the people appreciate your engagement on it.

But you ultimately shrug responsibility for power a .dll like this can provide and demand blind faith and trust in who has access to the data and who can manipulate the data.

Without a 3rd party being allowed to examine the code and determine whether it can be used maliciously, or outlining who is given access and when aka more detail oversight assurance etc., all due respect, you are essentially just blowing smoke and sweet nothings like the NSA.

Just saying.

Alaron01 · #65 10-20-2015, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secrets [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty much, a DLL can do all of that. But his doesn't that is the key.

It'd set off AVs and then some. And not just on runtime; it only sets off AVs on runtime because it's packed with Themida. If it was sending your bank information or recording keystrokes you figured someone would've picked that up by now.

I believe you that it doesn't do anything malicious. However, it's completely reasonable to be suspicious of it. I don't see any supporting arguments for your case.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secrets

Dump the DLL and reverse it yourself if you're so concerned. I know what it does and I am not concerned.

There are not many people who can do this. This expectation is absurd and makes you look silly.

I don't understand why this shouldn't be open sourced. I mean it is trivial to reverse it anyway, right? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Man0warr · #66 10-20-2015, 05:10 AM

I guess if you don't take them at their word and don't want to check the code yourself then your only option is to stop playing P99. They aren't changing the DLL.

khanable · #67 10-20-2015, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man0warr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess if you don't take them at their word and don't want to check the code yourself then your only option is to stop playing P99. They aren't changing the DLL.

^

"my house my rules"

rollin5k · #68 10-20-2015, 07:33 AM

I hope rogean doesn't find my taint pics!

Ostros · #69 10-20-2015, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To be fair, most of your replies in this thread as well as the official explanation are NSA-level in response to the Snowden revelations.

You and the staff have provided some good insight, and the people appreciate your engagement on it.

But you ultimately shrug responsibility for power a .dll like this can provide and demand blind faith and trust in who has access to the data and who can manipulate the data.

Without a 3rd party being allowed to examine the code and determine whether it can be used maliciously, or outlining who is given access and when aka more detail oversight assurance etc., all due respect, you are essentially just blowing smoke and sweet nothings like the NSA.

Just saying.

I hope you're just being stupid on purpose like the other guy.

Ostros · #70 10-20-2015, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alaron01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I believe you that it doesn't do anything malicious. However, it's completely reasonable to be suspicious of it. I don't see any supporting arguments for your case.

There are not many people who can do this. This expectation is absurd and makes you look silly.

I don't understand why this shouldn't be open sourced. I mean it is trivial to reverse it anyway, right? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"It's perfectly reasonable to be tinfoil over a .dll file, but asking me to investigate facts is just silly." Alaron01 - 2015