RMTers discuss P1999 dsetup.dll "includes some NSA-level intrusive scans on your PC"

[xKoopa]

Lol


First

[Braknar]

So glad everyone believes what they read on the internet.

For an official comment, please see https://www.reddit.com/r/project1999...ograms/cw5bqjv

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Braknar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So glad everyone believes what they read on the internet.

For an official comment, please see https://www.reddit.com/r/project1999...ograms/cw5bqjv

do you not see the irony in your comment

[Braknar]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you not see the irony in your comment

Hahah touche.

Though this isn't new, this comes up often, the answer is the same every time.

[booter]

Originally Posted by Braknar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hahah touche.

Though this isn't new, this comes up often, the answer is the same every time.

Isn't that what Bush did?

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you not see the irony in your comment

Irony >>>>> Tinfoil

[Renem]

Originally Posted by Braknar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So glad everyone believes what they read on the internet.

For an official comment, please see https://www.reddit.com/r/project1999...ograms/cw5bqjv

Do you not see why folks would be especially cautious of a modified aging game client that can be used to see private information? It isn't like it is something that is out of the question. It is a very real possibility and most players here do not know any of the P1999 staff, so what assurance would we have that they are acting in good faith?

I understand the tediousness of explaining it as Rogean did, but suspending my post until damage control was put up and then coming at this with snark is an awful way to go about things wouldn't you say?

[Braknar]

Originally Posted by Renem [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you not see why folks would be especially cautious of a modified aging game client that can be used to see private information? It isn't like it is something that is out of the question. It is a very real possibility and most players here do not know any of the P1999 staff, so what assurance would we have that they are acting in good faith?

I understand the tediousness of explaining it as Rogean did, but suspending my post until damage control was put up and then coming at this with snark is an awful way to go about things wouldn't you say?

You're making an awful lot of assumptions here.

The post was initially blanket deleted as it contained links to RedGuides. On second review, as you can see, I removed the RG links and restored it into it's proper section (Rants n Flames).