#31
|
|||
|
Sadad, Chest agreed to YDYN as Anichek noted. In fact, Chest refused to agree to a Noble rotation in the past, insisting on YDYN. I don't see a post anywhere where BDA opts out of YDYN. So, every guild was operating under the assumption that the YDYN agreement was still in place.
IF BDA wanted to amend the agreement or suggest a different allocation mechanism post-Velious, then they should have put up a post and worked that out with the existing guilds in the agreement. I think you guys made a bad call killing that Noble, and should make it right.
__________________
Drakakade ~ Divinity
| ||
|
#32
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sadad - crusader
Shamwow - oracle Streetjustice - warlord | ||||
|
#33
|
||||
|
Quote:
not answering to a post does not under any circumstance insinuate that you are no longer part of something. At most it insinuates that you were too busy to respond. Also, I was refering to IB nuking the sky agreement, nothing to do with the RMT TMO ban hammer. | |||
|
#34
|
||||
|
Quote:
Please tell me why you think YNYD makes sense in the post-Kunark landscape.
__________________
Sadad - crusader
Shamwow - oracle Streetjustice - warlord | |||
|
#35
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you think it's worth killing then it's worth maintaining. Maintaining includes the needs of all guilds. Including BDA. Which means we are equal stake holders in that responsibility. And equally responsible for breaking it willfully and intentionally. | |||
|
#36
|
|||
|
Not following your logic here, bud. Noble is worth killing but the agreement isn't worth maintaining if only guilds stuck on stale content are able to kill him. What are you trying to say?
If you want to work out a different arrangement, BDA will be more than willing to abide by a reasonable agreement. We aren't about trying to monopolize these pixels, but YDYN is not reasonable for Velious raiding. That should be obvious to everyone here. Velious broke the agreement, not BDA.
__________________
Sadad - crusader
Shamwow - oracle Streetjustice - warlord | ||
|
#37
|
||||
|
Quote:
If that's true then we can discuss it and come up with a new effective method. Forcably taking something that was not agreed on under false and acknowledged pretense is plainly wrong. | |||
|
#38
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#39
|
|||
|
This thread is starting to qualify for RnF. People can rule/agreement lawyer there instead if we move it? I don't want to read this garbage on the raid forum.
__________________
https://www.asgardguild.net Whoever wields this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor! -Odin
https://www.twitch.tv/artaenc I stream other games on here also like Monster Hunter World Guild Leader of <Asgard> The home of the gods! Lightyear/Artah | ||
|
#40
|
||||
|
Who actually has a sky day currently? AG, Omni, and Anonymous? So we want to keep up with "your day, your noble" for all these guilds, but only 3 (and it could be more but I think it's highly unlikely) actually have a sky day?
YDYN mattered when sky was raided literally every single day of the week by a different raid guild every day and night. That isn't the case anymore, everyone can acknowledge that right? Another bit of common ground is everyone has still agreed to leave Overseers up so that's a plus. YDYN doesn't represent a good solution for guilds that don't raid sky weekly. What's the better solution?
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| |||
|
|
|