Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:49 PM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default ok....

@ uth - yeah yeah, i would run the show the same way. I'm saying that taken to their logical conclusion, the rules are favoring the rights of solo-ers (who are there for loot not xp) over groups. Something just feels more legit about the group's claim here, even if it precludes their physical presence in said camps.

There is of course a lot of gray, some camps are never really xp camps, some dungeons are more spread out, etc.. I just think that you cant treat individuals and groups the same way in these, admittedly, infantile conflicts.
  #52  
Old 01-05-2011, 10:30 PM
Stibe Stibe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 216
Default

So a group of 6 lvl 49 mages should be allowed to hold down all the named camps in lguk then?
  #53  
Old 01-06-2011, 12:01 AM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default

Lol, interesting wording. Under the rules, a GROUP of them would not be allowed. But if they were 6 individuals not grouped, then they can sit on all the best loot of any given area. Legally, even though it's dickery. I just wanted to throw in my 2cp on the way a single farmer has equal claim as a group of 6 in the eyes of the rules. I have faith that our GMs are intelligent enough to recognize when the ver batim interpretation of the definition of "camp" etc. is being abused. (Sidenote : my guess is when Kunark opens and you see gear hungry 50lvls and xp hungry groups all jammed in the same zones fighting for the same spawns this discussion will be more relevant.)
  #54  
Old 01-06-2011, 10:23 AM
Madigan Madigan is offline
Aviak

Madigan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 61
Default

Wow, so much discussion over one simple rule...

If you are camping a static spawn, BE at the spawn. It doesn't matter if it's a group or single person, just BE at the spawn.
__________________
  #55  
Old 01-06-2011, 11:03 AM
Dyrkoon Dyrkoon is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Default

I agree if it's xp your after, then you can get it in an area that doesnt have loot...but when it's named loot droppers----> the soloer and the group have equal claim to "camp's",
Because at those camps "most of the time" it's all about the drops anyhow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #56  
Old 01-06-2011, 04:17 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,556
Default

In 1999-2001 if I was clearing 2-3 camps with an example magician, and more players arrived in the zone, I would choose my camp and let them have what they wanted to occupy.

If I would have tried to say.. "Hey guys, yeah I'm killing these 3 camps.", they would say "Hey man, good luck when it pops, but I'll be here in aggro range."

Seems common sense to me. Instances are a different game.
  #57  
Old 01-06-2011, 05:31 PM
redbandit redbandit is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DetroitVelvetSmooth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol, interesting wording. Under the rules, a GROUP of them would not be allowed. But if they were 6 individuals not grouped, then they can sit on all the best loot of any given area.
Nobody with any respect or decency would walk in on two people claiming the mobs, but if we group people start flaming and all of the sudden we are in the wrong. I dont enjoy petitioning or being petitioned, i wanna sit and gain experience and be undisturbed =P Please dont quote my last line out of context to say "oh yeah sure everyone wants to camp every guk named by themselves undisturbed" this is completely different. If i was just farming platinum with 7 specs, i would be more than happy to give them up for people who wanted xp, and this isnt me running across the zone to camp them all, i can walk 5 seconds and be at the next spectre, i suppose everyone been arguing if u have to walk its not yours, but this seems a little more reasonable than camping the guards at oggok and the lizards at CT zonein. Either way question answered, and most people politely ask for a tell when theres some specs open and im happy to oblige! anyone who likes the spectres try to remember that one about me [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #58  
Old 01-06-2011, 06:07 PM
h0tr0d (shaere) h0tr0d (shaere) is offline
Fire Giant

h0tr0d (shaere)'s Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 871
Default

if you two can kill all 7 before repops, they're all yours. If you can't, then that is when you can't claim them all.
  #59  
Old 01-06-2011, 06:18 PM
redbandit redbandit is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0tr0d (shaere) [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if you two can kill all 7 before repops, they're all yours. If you can't, then that is when you can't claim them all.
well thats what i thought too
  #60  
Old 01-06-2011, 07:12 PM
Timzilla Timzilla is offline
Orc


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redbandit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
well thats what i thought too
Learn'n is good.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.