Question Regarding Further Expansions - Page 12

mr_jon3s · #**111** 07-12-2015, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rararboker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes and this is a huge hallmark of classic eq. You know, that game we are all here for.

For me the only reason I'm here is because other servers have boxing. If I could play on a PoP server without boxing and had the population of p99 I would. But I haven't found a server like this and so I'm here.

myriverse · #**112** 07-12-2015, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr_jon3s [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For me the only reason I'm here is because other servers have boxing. If I could play on a PoP server without boxing and had the population of p99 I would. But I haven't found a server like this and so I'm here.

^^This^^

Rararboker · #**113** 07-12-2015, 03:31 PM

Well then, probably not going to be as fun for you then. I am pretty happy where the server is and where it plans to go. And this is coming from someone who mains a class who gets massive benefits from SoL and PoP.

webrunner5 · #**114** 07-12-2015, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They were non combat pets that gave bonuses to stats like hp and mana regen and stuff like that

One of the big steps to helping wizards not be complete ass in a group setting. I mean they were still ass but it helped

I think they help with less Fizzles also. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]