Hey Forsaken - Page 11

Alarti0001 · #**101** 06-10-2015, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you want to look at it in degrees Rampage was more of a "new entity" than Forsaken and even then Rampage ended up serving some of IB's suspension once all the dust settled. If anything that proves that a new guild name isn't a clean slate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Does this explain your focus on syntax over content?

Rampage being suspended and reforming to still eat some suspension has 0 relevance to TMO being dissolved while not under any punishment.

If you are going to try to impersonate me at least try to keep up kiddo.

Troubled · #**102** 06-10-2015, 12:18 PM

Now they have time to form up and sort shit out like they wanted. Grats [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Samoht · #**103** 06-10-2015, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merekai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think Forsaken was trying to knowingly circumvent the class system, or whatever language Rogean used.

You must be the only one who hasn't seen the screen shot of their forums where they discuss using the rebrand as a tool to circumvent the class system.

Alarti0001 · #**104** 06-10-2015, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Staff opinion seems to be it was a rebrand, and that opinion is more relevant than whatever reality might have been.

What solution would you offer to prevent large groups of people flipping between classes by cycling the creation of new guilds?

Or do you not see that as a problem that would need to be addressed?

You are asking me to try to make a smart raid scene with the current raid structure? I wouldn't. The system is inherently flawed.

Prismaticshop · #**105** 06-10-2015, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Staff opinion seems to be it was a rebrand, and that opinion is more relevant than whatever reality might have been.

What solution would you offer to prevent large groups of people flipping between classes by cycling the creation of new guilds?

Or do you not see that as a problem that would need to be addressed?

Like guilds reform every Weeks or some shit ?

TMO has been around for years, it's not like their reform every weeks.

What matters is and the core of the argument is what makes a new entity? The big issue on top of that is that both class C entities reformed recently.

arsenalpow · #**106** 06-10-2015, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misek84 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why harshly punish one guild and barely punish another?

Rampage didn't kill class C targets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Chest do you realize that despite your burning rage for TMO/Forsaken, that YOU are actually the venomous entity on this server. What you did to the class R rotation that you previously self-congratulated yourself on for years is truly reprehensible. You walk around like some champion of the common man, but it is in fact you that took food out of your fellow class R players mouths. How you manage to fool any of these idiots is amazing. Neckbearding without neckbearding. Greed without greed. Loot-hungry newbs deploying the same no-life tactics class C does in class R, yet still maintaining an air of superiority about it.

Let's acknowledge the giant elephant in the room please and realize the class r/class c experiment failed. And ironically it failed because its very adopters ultimately gamed the very system they fought to create.

Can't respond, too busy seething with rage or something.

Alarti0001 · #**107** 06-10-2015, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pringles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO complaining about raid rules when TMO is a big part of the reason those raid rules exist. Grats all.

This is factually incorrect. Considering the source... I'm not surprised.

Samoht · #**108** 06-10-2015, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rampage being suspended and reforming to still eat some suspension has 0 relevance to TMO being dissolved while not under any punishment.

If you are going to try to impersonate me at least try to keep up kiddo.

Chest says the two suspensions are unrelated and cannot be compared. You say the two suspensions are unrelated and cannot be compared. I'd posit that you're in agreement. Case closed.

By the way, learn the difference between parody and impersonation.

Cecily · #**109** 06-10-2015, 12:22 PM

So who else would like see to totally not TMO anymore take their punishment and then wait for demotion just to wreck class R out of spite?

Prismaticshop · #**110** 06-10-2015, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You must be the only one who hasn't seen the screen shot of their forums where they discuss using the rebrand as a tool to circumvent the class system.

That screenshot where they mention to check with Sirken that it's fine ?

And where they mention Rampage "did it so we can do it too" ?