
06-09-2015, 04:40 PM
|
|
Planar Protector
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This argument makes no sense to anyone who knows how guilds grow, get sick, explode, etc.
Ok, so around 2013 a core or even a majority of TMO decided to end the run. But some obviously stayed, or the name would not exist, nor would the guild have been able to continue (no guild bank, no roster, etc.)
You can't say "but that was not the real TMO"
That is just laughable. Some left, some stayed, those who stayed continued on their way and kept things moving more or less, but whatever internal issues contributed to the 2013 exodus has now led to phase two of the Troubles. Stop trying to turn this into some overly complicated just cause.
Predictable dominant guild breaks apart partially, some stay, new members jump on the ship, but predictable dominant guild still has issues, and falls apart. Some go to form new venture.
That's predictable guild stuff. Stop taking yourself so seriously. "The real TMO" -- lol.
I'm the real Sadre, though.
|
Your argument doesn't make sense. If I made a character on Red named Sadre.. would I be the real Sadre? Is an entity only described by its name? Or lets say when character trading was still allowed and you allowed someone else to play your character or ending up trading it for plat. Would that new player be the real Sadre?
Dumb
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
|
|
|
|
|