PnP is classic, with highlights

[Nirgon]

RZ did not have an agreed rotation in Velious, we had a war

[Syft-X]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

RZ did not have an agreed rotation in Velious, we had a war

No one guild on Rallos monopolized raid target like we've seen here

[Eslade]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

RZ did not have an agreed rotation in Velious, we had a war

Was 60% of the server in one guild?

[pink grapefruit]

Originally Posted by Ragnaros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also if we are being honest there wasnt really monopolization of raid targets on live like here besides sullon zek (no rules) servers like rz tz and vz all had agreed rotations

VZ did not have rotations.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Syft-X [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude you can't post a PNP stating it should be instituted because it's classic and then pick and choose which rules we should follow and which ones we shouldn't?

Why isn't this making sense to you?

I know how they work and can prove no one was disbanded for being a dominant raid pvp guild. Ever.

You don't and are twisting -- this rule you are going after is along the lines of being in Najena and camping the key mobs on a pve server to prevent people from being able to camp things you don't need

People were suspended for portal camping, training, bind camping, harassing other players, harassing/attacking staff, and... (drum roll) dispelling raid mobs etc with a force that has no chance of killing it! I have a link with proof of the rule to back up my citation of a specific player, mob and occurrence.

You, on the other hand, think fear and charm should be added to this server "because its classic" and your friend Runya here is telling you otherwise. You're really goofed up lol... hope Quantized still isn't "out to get you".

[Ragnaros]

There was some but little pvp still in Velious and even then there was rotations with AD/Wudan, all im sayong was that there was never one guild getting all the targets, not even today. Sony never let it happen because it would make a pvp real ugly
So i think we need to be real classic here, we can play the blue way or have no rules, we cant pick and choose what suits us

[Ragnaros]

And yes Vallon Zek had rotations in classic and kunark, it wasnt needed for velious because there wasnt a large variety of guilds in TOV like there was in RZ

[Eslade]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know how they work and can prove no one was disbanded for being a dominant raid pvp guild. Ever.

You don't and are twisting -- this rule you are going after is along the lines of being in Najena and camping the key mobs on a pve server to prevent people from being able to camp things you don't need

People were suspended for portal camping, training, bind camping, harassing other players, harassing/attacking staff, and... (drum roll) dispelling raid mobs etc with a force that has no chance of killing it! I have a link with proof of the rule to back up my citation of a specific player, mob and occurrence.

You, on the other hand, think fear and charm should be added to this server "because its classic" and your friend Runya here is telling you otherwise. You're really goofed up lol... hope Quantized still isn't "out to get you".

got proof?

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Eslade [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

got proof?

your turn

I'm right, prove me wrong

[HippoNipple]

You guys are putting a lot of effort into getting some sort of rule in place on a server where rules are rarely followed by GMs when making decisions.

When it comes down to it, if a GM is present and they see something that looks like a dick move they will just ban everyone involved regardless of what the rules are.