PnP is classic, with highlights

[Eslade]

If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP

what if your raid strategy is to wait for the zerg to do a decent amount of the damage, wipe them out and then attempt to take the mob? I would consider that a reasonable chance.

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That post is from 2005.

Yar and it's a link to a quote of a quote. please find y2k pnp and get back to us.

[Runya]

Never heard of the zones they speak of in the example

[SamwiseRed]

zone and portal camping illegal?

plz enable, much bans.

[Runya]

I love frags response about a blue gm.....was that gm you nirgs? Blue fgt

[Nirgon]

If raid X had yet to engage in the encounter, the raid should find a PvP solution.
If both raid X and Y engage simultaneously, they should find a PvP solution.
If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, raid X should find a PvP solution.
If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y by training, we will enforce the PnP.

Enjoy.

*notches FQ belt*

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

zone and portal camping illegal?

plz enable, much bans.

Need to ban Ragnaros again the guy sits at OT hammer spot and engages people before they have control of their characters. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[SamwiseRed]

next person that kills me at kc zone-in gonna get banned the fuck up

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Pikrib [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Need to ban Ragnaros again the guy sits at OT hammer spot and engages people before they have control of their characters. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually this would be something that was illegal under PnP, ya. I got a warning for portal camping on RZ... not even knowing it was a rule when it first came out. Nice to get a warning instead of a stacking suspension, u kno?

1.
If raid X had yet to engage in the encounter, the raid should find a PvP solution
2. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP
3. If both raid X and Y engage simultaneously, they should find a PvP solution
4. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, raid X should find a PvP solution
5. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y by training, we will enforce the PnP

^ this is exactly what should be in place.

If Azrael wants to take 40 or so players and sit there baiting us to engage... fine. If 2 neckbeards wanna sit at character select and listen for a spy call to cause a wipe? Heh, ok. That will work both ways and result in a pretty shitty box.

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Enjoy.

*notches FQ belt*

You still never posted the origional 1999 link.