GMs taking away loots - Page 3

Scrooge · #21 02-06-2010, 05:57 PM

So if say a raid force zones into Hate, and there's a group in the zone...they should just gtfo because some guild is about to raid? I don't think so.

RyoGTO · #22 02-06-2010, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That doesn't exist.

First capable force at a target has the rights to that target.. within 30 minutes.

We were the first ones to inny, there shouldn't have been an issue.

There was no issue. No one should have had loot taken away from them.

Recyclebin · #23 02-06-2010, 05:59 PM

Kill target, get loot.

Unless the loot is non-classic, why the fuck is loot forcefully being removed off players.

Edit: Looks like there was some good explanation on the subject. meh

RyoGTO · #24 02-06-2010, 06:08 PM

I wish I would have gotten a screen shot of those gloves. It's likely no one will ever see them again.

yaaaflow · #25 02-06-2010, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyoGTO [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wish I would have gotten a screen shot of those gloves. It's likely no one will ever see them again.

It strikes me as so ridiculously likely that those gloves will be seen again to barely be worthy of mention.

Besides it's Dabamf we should really feel for, 36% haste items are all over the place, having to give back the only necro focus item in the game is a real kick in the balls.

RyoGTO · #26 02-06-2010, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yaaaflow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It strikes me as so ridiculously likely that those gloves will be seen again to barely be worthy of mention.

Besides it's Dabamf we should really feel for, 36% haste items are all over the place, having to give back the only necro focus item in the game is a real kick in the balls.

Hey, I do feel sorry for all the guys that lost their loot. As I know what it feels like, and it's not cool. Those gloves are incredibly rare though. I am not mad at IB or Trans for who went after what, I don't think rules were broken. To be honest I think the bickering should not influence the loot, but rather what was actually done, and since no foul play was done as far as raiding policy.... No one should be losing their loot. Neither IB nor Trans. It's a real freaking shame here.

Goobles · #27 02-06-2010, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That doesn't exist.

First capable force at a target has the rights to that target.. within 30 minutes.

We were the first ones to inny, there shouldn't have been an issue.

It's called etiquette. IB has bad etiquette since Transcendence was in Hate first, with a capable force to do the entire zone - and then IB leapfrogged them.

Zexa · #28 02-06-2010, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goobles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's called etiquette. IB has bad etiquette since Transcendence was in Hate first, with a capable force to do the entire zone - and then IB leapfrogged them.

Hay Goobles. Thanks for contributing! Read the rules regarding The Planes. A little less stepping on each other's toes could be worked on, but the new rules are gonna be preeeetty nice.

One should expect to hear some crying about them in regards to Hate. The entire server was told when the zone was opening, allowing everyone eligible to port there to be first. Now that we have spawn variance it will be whoever is quickest or wants to camp a target the longest.

Pheer · #29 02-06-2010, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goobles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's called etiquette. IB has bad etiquette since Transcendence was in Hate first, with a capable force to do the entire zone - and then IB leapfrogged them.

they were only ahead of us into the zone by like 1-2 groups goobles

Ive tried to stay neutral in regards to you man but im really getting bored of seeing you shit talking my guild in every thread you post in when we've done nothing wrong

Dabamf · #30 02-06-2010, 07:18 PM

Sorry dude they were there like 2 min before IB was, and still at port in playin with their dicks when they coulda been moving straight to inny after a few kills like we did. Hate doesn't require leapfrogging.

And besides, transc didn't compete for inny, they moved immediately to Maestro. Bottom line is when you go after maestro first, you can't cry about inny. That's like having 2 guilds in solb, and you are in 2 min before the other guild, you go kill efreeti and then petition that the other guild leapfrogged you to naggy.

Another case of Tibador crying and ruining the game. That guy is such a trainwreck and a plague on the server. He cuts corners and uses his power to manipulate decisions on a regular basis. Divinity will unfortunately find that out soon enough.