Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2015, 11:46 PM
Tanthallas Tanthallas is offline
Fire Giant

Tanthallas's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We wanted to try solo from the start, but we wanted to be cool about everything and let anyone that was keyed show up. So after we killed a few mobs with a full PUG raid we tried to do a BDA only thing and Sloan/IB (or the 10 people they had) turned it into a "BDA WANTS ALL THE PIXELS" when in reality we just wanted to see where we measured up as a guild to that content. We never got that chance because like I said the rest of the PUG contingent had a shit fit so we just said "fuck it" and kept doing the pug thing.
YOU never wanted to try solo from the start.
YOU had no say about letting anyone go or not.
YOU did not kill a few mobs and then decide to do a BDA only - My and Getsomes unsanctioned force did.
YOU never got a chance to try solo because the people that were with us had doubts about BDAs loot council in light of how loot was distributed outside of VP when TMO was banned.


Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yikes Sloan with a PM from Getsome that proves nothing. Sloan never was privy to decision making officer chat so he has no clue, which is FE was formed because we refused to give him a say. Thems the facts jack.
It shows that BDA had zero responsibility for the VP raiding and the people who came - I recommend Thursday, Getsome recommends right away on Monday, i.e., the whole first week of raiding is mysteriously missing from BDAs plans. BDA did not 'want to be cool and let anyone with a key come' and then decide to do the last week itself.

FE was formed because BDA had zero intention of challenging TMO and distributed loot in a way that rewarded people who had long term status in the guild as opposed to those who were responsible for its recent successes - i.e., not a system of loot distribution that could support a raiding guild.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daliant17447 View Post
more ducktape than exploit
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.