Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:37 PM
Naerron Naerron is offline
Fire Giant

Naerron's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kich [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
PVP, team PVP, RP, FV (which didn't exist during classic anyways), etc. is unclassic-like. There was not a specific server that rotated it's type. Seriously, think to yourself: "Did this exist in classic EQ?" if the answer is no, then it won't be done here. There's a pretty big list of custom servers, or you could even make your own if you put enough time into it, but what you're looking for with that idea isn't what this server is.
Ok Kich, i sat down, and cerally thought about it. I gave my beard about 73.4r strokes, then my dog had to pee, so i let him out. But, when i came back i did some research, and low and behold, these servers did exist on classic. I took my initial raw data from the research back to the lab to run some tests.

So, what i first did was affirm by affirming. To do this i employed this equation:

( P ^ ( P --> Q )) --> Q

Bascially,
If P than Q
P
Therefore Q

Following what you said:
If elements of the game were present in classic EQ then they are on P99
These elements were present in classic EQ
Therefore they (should) be present on P99

I will take this a step further because i can tell that you won't be fooled by Aristotle and his logic. An argument is valid if and only if the truth of its premises entails the truth of its conclusion. It would be self-contradictory to affirm the premises and deny the conclusion. The corresponding conditional of a valid argument is a logical truth and the negation of its corresponding conditional is a contradiction. The conclusion is a logical consequence of its premises.

This makes it obvious that my argument could still be valid without any reality to the premises. So let's take a careful look at the premises..

Premises:
1) Does P99 try to emulate all aspects of classic? - yes
2) Did PvP and RP server(s) exist in classic? - yes
3) Did Kich's mom(s) take him to the prom? - yes
4) Does that phasing idea suck? - yes
5) Was there ever a specific team pvp server? - no

So, Kich. I thought cerally, and i think my argument is sound. Also, to whoever it was; when you have an idea this great often times you come off sounding like you have an ego, i am sure Jesus did too. It's like when you see someone stacked in rare raid items, you assume they are jerks with a giant e-schlong but, like an onion, you need to peel away the layers of pixilated armor and take that person for who they are, and in this case it's someone with a great idea.
  #22  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:45 PM
Naerron Naerron is offline
Fire Giant

Naerron's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 597
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Quod erat demonstrandum Mr. Powers
  #23  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:50 PM
Kich Kich is offline
Orc


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naerron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok Kich, i sat down, and cerally thought about it. I gave my beard about 73.4r strokes, then my dog had to pee, so i let him out. But, when i came back i did some research, and low and behold, these servers did exist on classic. I took my initial raw data from the research back to the lab to run some tests.

So, what i first did was affirm by affirming. To do this i employed this equation:

( P ^ ( P --> Q )) --> Q

Bascially,
If P than Q
P
Therefore Q

Following what you said:
If elements of the game were present in classic EQ then they are on P99
These elements were present in classic EQ
Therefore they (should) be present on P99

I will take this a step further because i can tell that you won't be fooled by Aristotle and his logic. An argument is valid if and only if the truth of its premises entails the truth of its conclusion. It would be self-contradictory to affirm the premises and deny the conclusion. The corresponding conditional of a valid argument is a logical truth and the negation of its corresponding conditional is a contradiction. The conclusion is a logical consequence of its premises.

This makes it obvious that my argument could still be valid without any reality to the premises. So let's take a careful look at the premises..

Premises:
1) Does P99 try to emulate all aspects of classic? - yes
2) Did PvP and RP server(s) exist in classic? - yes
3) Did Kich's mom(s) take him to the prom? - yes
4) Does that phasing idea suck? - yes
5) Was there ever a specific team pvp server? - no

So, Kich. I thought cerally, and i think my argument is sound. Also, to whoever it was; when you have an idea this great often times you come off sounding like you have an ego, i am sure Jesus did too. It's like when you see someone stacked in rare raid items, you assume they are jerks with a giant e-schlong but, like an onion, you need to peel away the layers of pixilated armor and take that person for who they are, and in this case it's someone with a great idea.
umadbro?

Anyways, there wasn't any argument. You asked if you had a terrible idea, sorry you got butthurt. Vallon Zek was a pretty specific team pvp server. And for the record, I went to the prom with a girl that was a little taller than I was, she wore high heels which really exaggerated the difference to an embarassing degree, overall she wasn't bad--she had pretty sweet tits but was way too christian to use them, clearly I made a bad call (as I found out the next week I had options that actually would put out). So did I have a shitty night? Definitely.

Your idea is really bad. I can't really tell if you're trolling or just nerd raging though. I'm leaning towards nerd raging from the emphasis on a word I only said once. I gave you a pretty solid answer too--go make your own server. This isn't what you're looking for. Maybe you can find e-schlongs or whatever at your next destination.
Last edited by Kich; 11-17-2010 at 09:59 PM..
  #24  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:51 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Yo, drop it.
  #25  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:57 PM
Naerron Naerron is offline
Fire Giant

Naerron's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 597
Default

6) Am i bored out of my mind at this 4 hour long seminar on Aristotelian logic - yes
7) Did i fail terribly at trolling - yes...or did i? - yes
  #26  
Old 11-18-2010, 12:25 AM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naerron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
6) Am i bored out of my mind at this 4 hour long seminar on Aristotelian logic - yes Your life sucks bro? I'm sorry?
7) Did i fail terribly at trolling - yes...or did i? - yes
There have seriously been more posts about the devs making a seperate server just for pvp for over a year now...

It's not going, there isnt enough interest, there aren't enough devs/guides to watch over 2 servers. Go red flag ffs.

8) Are you going to keep pressing the issue - yes most likely
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.