![]() |
|
#81
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#82
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'll admit, I'm pretty pissed about this. But unstable? Nah, I'm not muslim. I'm not violent, never have been. I'll leave that to Muhammad and his followers. I'm just advocating a change of course, and as upsetting as that might be to apologists, I think most people can see that it's time to reassess the West's immigration policy.
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
|
||||
|
#83
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#84
|
|||
|
iroquois them all and be done with it already.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#85
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm glad you mentioned the Dutch, why don't you look up what happened to Van Gogh's great-grandnephew. Spoiler alert, Muslims killed him for having an opinion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_va...lm_director%29 1. The Middle East isn't being modernized. The only places that are getting better are Oman and Tunisia ... neither of those things have anything to do with the West. They have to do with Muslims, thankfully, finally having decent leadership and challenging the bull shit ultra-conservative orthodoxy. Sadly, those two countries make up like 15 million people total out of that 1.6 billion Muslims you mention. The problem is not that all Muslims are "radical," the problem is that large majorities of them think that the death penalty is acceptable for apostasy, that adultery is punishable by stoning, and that women are property. From that cultural baseline, a long line of "radicals," at least from the perspective of a liberal western society, spring forth. 2. Immigration restrictions aren't going to solve the problem, there are already way too many Muslims in Europe. But why continue to let people in who clearly don't have any desire to be a part of secular European society? I'm not trying to ad hominem attack you, I'm honestly just pissed; I for the life of me don't understand how people can not agree 100% that Muslims are dangerous to the rest of us. That doesn't mean they all are, certainly not, but it's starting to be a trend here. I mean holy shit, Boko Haram just completely their conquest of an entire Nigerian state today. Letting in immigrants from these countries, who are so far behind in culture, can do nothing to advance the cause of people already living within them, at least compared to other immigrant groups, like anyone from Latin America, who most likely wouldn't resort to violence. Is what I'm saying really that hard to understand? Is it really that hateful? I think it's logical.... I guess it isn't. 3. Matt Stone and Trey Parker aren't in danger because America has done a much better job assimilating Muslims for two reasons: a) They weren't the overwhelming immigrant group being allowed in (Muslims are nearer to 1% in America whereas in France they're 6-8% and concentrated in Marseille and Paris, mostly). b) America has always done better at assimilating people... It's a nation founded by immigration. Europe isn't doing it that well to be honest. I think we have plenty of instances of Islamic terrorism to prove that we're a target of them as well though.
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
|
||||
|
#86
|
|||
|
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | ||
|
|
|||
|
#87
|
|||
|
this
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#88
|
|||
|
Not really an appropriate analogy, keep trying!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#89
|
|||
|
Do u disagree that Terrosism has no religion? Or do u agree KKK do not represents the christian religion?
Oh wait i think i know what u agree with, Islamic terrosist represent the musilm... Am i right? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#90
|
|||
|
How is the kkk analogous to the killings in Paris? Don't answer a question with another question, what are you a woman?
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|