Guns are banned, people still died.

[Sidelle]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't even say anything about gun legality why are you yelling at me?

:*(

Shit, I don't even know. It's been one of those days, I guess.

LOL [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Sidelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shit, I don't even know. It's been one of those days, I guess.

LOL [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its cause she's a woman. Women are crazy. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Faron]

Originally Posted by Lictor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I appreciate the 'home is your castle' elevated protection mentality in the US. If you want a firearm to protect your children and family by all means you should be able to get one; however, you don't need a fucking assault rifle to hunt or open carry in a Wendy's. That's just ridiculous.

Another guy claiming to be the moral compass on who "needs" what, and probably thinks "assault rifle" means machine gun.

Out of curiousity, if you open carry in a Wendy's, who is that harming?

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Faron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another guy claiming to be the moral compass on who "needs" what, and probably thinks "assault rifle" means machine gun.

Out of curiousity, if you open carry in a Wendy's, who is that harming?

The person you shoot in a psychotic rage. Of course.

[Lictor]

Originally Posted by Faron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another guy claiming to be the moral compass on who "needs" what, and probably thinks "assault rifle" means machine gun.

Out of curiousity, if you open carry in a Wendy's, who is that harming?

The 'needs' sentence was meant as a hyperbole. The conditional phrase before it does not insert morality into the discussion.

Yes, I am aware of the differences between assault rifle v machine gun, and playing off you need an assault rifle to hunt is still ridiculous to me.

I would feel uncomfortable and/or unsafe with random_person01 walking into any place of business with a rifle or firearm of any kind slung around their shoulder or hip.

I don't know what type of training or qualifications that individual has with the firearm they are carrying, don't know the emotional status of the individual, or propensity which they would escalate a situation where they would feel using deadly force or the threat of deadly force would be necessary.

I lack faith in the intelligence and level headed reasoning of the average American to accurately judge adversarial situations. Throwing guns into the mix and the local Walmart over who stole the last Elmo doll for their kids christmas present, would eventually, over time, lead to an incident involving firearms.

[jettle]

Originally Posted by Lictor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, I am aware of the differences between assault rifle v machine gun, and playing off you need an assault rifle to hunt is still ridiculous to me.

assault rifles are military grade with automatic fire selections. A hunting rifle and a standard AR are essentially the same. One shot per trigger pull. I know plenty of people who use AR's to hunt due to its kill power, effective range and game size you can bag with. So i dont see the issue here. Or do you mean like someone hunting with an m60 or a SAW? an actual assault rifle. yeah that would be a total waste of an animal to litter it with bullets

[Sidelle]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its cause she's a woman. Women are crazy. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Faron]

Originally Posted by Lictor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you need an assault rifle to hunt is still ridiculous to me.

What so kind of weapons does one "need" to hunt? Bow hunting is a thing, so technically you don't "need" a gun at all.

I would feel uncomfortable and/or unsafe with random_person01 walking into any place of business with a rifle or firearm of any kind slung around their shoulder or hip.

That's not really their problem though is it?

[jettle]

Originally Posted by Faron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not really their problem though is it?

it wouldn't be mine. id be open carrying too if it were legal in my state.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Sidelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey genius, his point was that banning guns wouldn't do shit to stop violent criminals from shooting and killing whoever the fuck they want. What, do you think that rapists, murderers, etc. will step up and turn in their guns because suddenly they care about obeying laws? Lol. Right...

All a gun ban would do is make people like me into criminals overnight because fuck if I'll give up the one thing that allows me to defend myself in my own home.

You must live in some privileged gated-community/utopia/fantasyland where bad things never happen to good people.

Hey just to clear the air.. Sensible gun control laws would be designed to reduce the number of accidental deaths, to reduce crimes of passion, to reduce juvenile mental break downs and increase responsibility of gun owners.

It would be more difficult to get a gun yes, but if you're not responsible to file the right paperwork or to wait an appropriate amount of time , prove that you've taken classes, gotten a liscense, or purchased insurance... If any of these things seem too difficult for you, Then without a doubt you're not responsible enough to own a firearm.