Those 2 paragraphs were addressing 2 different arguments of yours, namely the 2 paragraphs I quoted. My para 1 is in response to your para 1, my para 2 is in response to your para 2.
You attempted to prove that God doesn't exist by saying His actions are insane. I am pointing out the counter-argument of Christians, which is that we cannot possibly understand the motivations and plans of God, therefore negating our ability to judge His actions.
Again you seem too stupid to realize I'm not arguing for the existence of God, I'm arguing that your "proofs" of his lack of existence have already been countered, and that there is evidence of the existence of God (with the level of credence given to that evidence not being relevant to the argument.)
Still waiting for you to show me where I claim I can prove the existence of God.
| 
11-03-2010, 04:49 PM
Threaded Mode