Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Would you donate for a new "rotation" blue server?
Yes, I would absolutely donate money for this 256 62.75%
No, I'm quite happy with the way things are 87 21.32%
Don't care one way or another 65 15.93%
Voters: 408. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:19 PM
myriverse myriverse is offline
Planar Protector

myriverse's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Swamp of N.O. Hope
Posts: 2,470
Default

Considering maybe donating, if it'll get people to shut up about new server this and that.

But really... no. Just no.
__________________
Gnawlunzs Phrogphry
Master Angler, Baker, Cadger, Drunk
"If you can't eat a frog, then eat two."
  #62  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:20 PM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The point is your poll does absolutely nothing to test is a new server would be a viable option. Its just an ego booster.
I don't see the "Chest is Awesome" option.
  #63  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:23 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't see the "Chest is Awesome" option.
You poor troll. There might be other ways to boost an ego. I have a very difficult time believing you are actually this stupid.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #64  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:26 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This. I am not trying to make it sound evil. Pay2win is viable on modern MMO's. A level playing field is something with rules that are easily applicable that all types of players can participate in whether it be casual or hardcore. What you are proposing to have caters to one type of player and you are saying you will pay to have it.

We need to work on the issues with this raid scene with common sense and make concrete rules that are easily understandable with very little gray area....To have a level playing field.
Lets run down your list for "level playing field" and see how rotation-enforced server does:
1) easily applicable - not your turn, avoid - check
2) all types of players can participate - you are allowed to play here, by the rules - check
3) casual - will pick P2000 - check
4) hardcore - can play with the easily applicable rules of P2000 or take their business/playtime to P1999 - check

P2000 would cater to casuals, but it does not exclude hardcores. Right now we have a server that caters to hardcores, and excluded casuals until the GMs put their foot down last January. Again, I haven't -won- anything against the PVE game that I did not have on P1999. Are you implying P1999 is not a PVE game? Because there's a lot of your ilk (read: class-C) that argue the competition is not PVP, you and them can't both be right.
  #65  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:27 PM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

I would donate generously for the ability to view more than 10 posts per page on this forum.

I'm concerned that splitting the population would result in an empty server. If I were sure both servers would have healthy populations, I would absolutely donate for more servers.
  #66  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:29 PM
Man0warr Man0warr is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

P99 would most likely become the empty one - and the two Class C guilds would slowly collapse or merge as their recruitment base would disappear.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will>
Manowarr - Druid

Blue
Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA>
Shiroe - 60 Enchanter
Manowarr - 60 Druid
  #67  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:30 PM
Troubled Troubled is offline
Sarnak

Troubled's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maestrom [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I would donate generously for the ability to view more than 10 posts per page on this forum.

I'm concerned that splitting the population would result in an empty server. If I were sure both servers would have healthy populations, I would absolutely donate for more servers.
Tiggles mentioned a couple times he had 20 posts per page. Not sure where that option went, but I didn't see it when I looked. Maybe after the forum was changed and then reverted, that option went away.
__________________
  #68  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:32 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man0warr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
P99 would most likely become the empty one - and the two Class C guilds would slowly collapse or merge as their recruitment base would disappear.
We would all just come to the Casual server and splinter into 18 separate guilds... for those rotations.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #69  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:36 PM
skipdog skipdog is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 462
Default

I don't think people comprehend the drawbacks of splitting blue's population.

It means it will be harder for people to find groups. This is going to prevent people who come on this server to try things out, from staying for any reasonable amount of time.

I get that some class R guilds still aren't happy with their free pixels that they weren't even getting before, but that seems like an awful reason to split this server's population.

If 'not getting enough mobs cuz TMO/IB gets most of them' is the primary motivation for a new server, wouldn't simply reducing all raid mob's spawn times in half be a better solution? Just a simple doubling of the total amount of raid content available. Seems like a far better solution to me that wouldn't involve turning both servers into servers not large enough to support lower level grouping at all levels.
  #70  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:36 PM
jcr4990 jcr4990 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 397
Default

Would donate as well as pay monthly if necessary. Know many people personally that would do the same.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.