Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #391  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:33 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
figured, even when the overlords of mages, coh and ducking mention the possibility of trying a race it doesnt matter

its all pitchforks and torches up in here
You just said that Taken will CoTH duck to rustle another guild. How is anyone supposed to take that? Do you not think that sort of behavior is detrimental?

Stellar of you to admit it, but it is still a problem.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #392  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:34 PM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,273
Default

You know, getting rid of CoTH ducking isn't the answer, it's addressing the problem that leads to coth ducking. We already know a tactic to replace coth ducking if that ever gets banned, which will just create a new problem. Focus on either making windows shorter or extending variance.
  #393  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:34 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Variance being reduced won't happen. It's been poo pooed already.

There really isn't any reform, which can be easily regulated, that will render anything that remotely resembles racing.
  #394  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:36 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There really isn't any reform, which can be easily regulated, that will render anything that remotely resembles racing.
except you know removing the FFA cycle and making repops an actual FFA scenario, but that could potentially shave mobs off the class C factory assembly line, can't have that
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #395  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:36 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You just said that Taken will CoTH duck to rustle another guild. How is anyone supposed to take that? Do you not think that sort of behavior is detrimental?

Stellar of you to admit it, but it is still a problem.
no I did not say Taken will do that to rustle another guild.

Some of our MEMBERS who track enjoy doing it.

Taken as a guild, which I have stated many many times, have never once asked anyone to do it.

and it was started as a JOKE not a strat.
  #396  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:37 PM
Amirite Amirite is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think most people in this thread or that know me will tell you straight up I'm pretty open and truthful. There are other strategies and pulling methods that are even faster than the one I mentioned here. All those strategies can be curbed by implementing foot races and the few stipulations I mentioned.
right so TMO can keep a rez box on a "foot racer" closer to spawn of the mob, get FTE then say you ran the whole way? obviously with not needing to run fraps no one would have proof...even though we couldn't provide enough proof for TMO anyway possible other then being in the FTErs basement watching behind them with a video camera?

unless you specify every possible way to get around something in specific rules it will only go back to where we are now..

FFA sim repops again is less rules and petitions..less headaches and more fun.. (which is what we all want here and you have not said anything about that not being true.)
  #397  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:37 PM
Man0warr Man0warr is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

Removing coth ducking just makes the race a zoneline creeping, fastest SSD-having race.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will>
Manowarr - Druid

Blue
Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA>
Shiroe - 60 Enchanter
Manowarr - 60 Druid
  #398  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:39 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You know, getting rid of CoTH ducking isn't the answer, it's addressing the problem that leads to coth ducking. We already know a tactic to replace coth ducking if that ever gets banned, which will just create a new problem. Focus on either making windows shorter or extending variance.
+1 I agree with Ella here.

I think the focus on COH and ducking, with fingers pointing directly at Taken is beyond absurd namely when we not only dont condone it, but support its removal.

How you 'remove it' is a little tricky bc I can only tell people what to do out there and everyone has some Dinacarls in their guild that just 'do their own thing' regardless if its something leadership wants to see happen.

We have broken zero rules tracking with our mages ( minus Sev gate but that was not a mage issue ).
Last edited by Erati; 10-30-2014 at 04:43 PM..
  #399  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:39 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You know, getting rid of CoTH ducking isn't the answer, it's addressing the problem that leads to coth ducking. We already know a tactic to replace coth ducking if that ever gets banned, which will just create a new problem. Focus on either making windows shorter or extending variance.
Would love to see a removal or reduction of variance.

Considering any changes to C/R/FFA, variance, etc, are off the table as per staff, what we're left with is player rules of engagement.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #400  
Old 10-30-2014, 04:44 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amirite [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
right so TMO can keep a rez box on a "foot racer" closer to spawn of the mob, get FTE then say you ran the whole way? obviously with not needing to run fraps no one would have proof...even though we couldn't provide enough proof for TMO anyway possible other then being in the FTErs basement watching behind them with a video camera?

unless you specify every possible way to get around something in specific rules it will only go back to where we are now..

FFA sim repops again is less rules and petitions..less headaches and more fun.. (which is what we all want here and you have not said anything about that not being true.)
I really would love to borrow your Tinfoil Hat. It seems impressive.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.