religion

[leewong]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

....

'Can't be reproduced in the field"

It has you just ignore the evidence.

"Is not observable"

It has you just ignore the evidence.

"You're a dumb motherfucker"

It's pretty obvious I am about 40-60 IQ points above you.

[G13]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

'Can't be reproduced in the field"

It has you just ignore the evidence.

"Is not observable"

It has you just ignore the evidence.

"You're a dumb motherfucker"

It's pretty obvious I am about 40-60 IQ points above you.

It's obvious you're a dumb brainwashed indoctrinated dumb mothefucker

When has a change of kinds ever been observed in the field?

When has entirely new and never before seen functioning genetic code ever spontaneously come into existence?

Let me help you. Never

Darwinism isn't true Science. It's a religion

[leewong]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

....

"When has a change of kinds ever been observed in the field?"

You mean species not kinds. You mean a chicken giving birth to a rabbit. Doesnt happen. Already explained it 5-10 times in previous posts. What makes you think explaining it again will do for you? My post history is there for you to dig through if you missed the answer to this question.

"When has entirely new and never before seen functioning genetic code ever spontaneously come into existence?"

That's not how it works, fella. I cant help it if you cannot grasp the concept of gradual change over time. Completely new genetic code spontaneously appearing wouldnt be gradual would it? See the problem with your question?

"Darwinism isn't true Science."
No, darwinism is a term used by dipshit creationists. The study of evolution encompasses many fields from geology to DNA analysis. Your ignorance gives me a headache.

[G13]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"When has a change of kinds ever been observed in the field?"

You mean species not kinds. You mean a chicken giving birth to a rabbit. Doesnt happen. Already explained it 5-10 times in previous posts. What makes you think explaining it again will do for you? My post history is there for you to dig through if you missed the answer to this question.

"When has entirely new and never before seen functioning genetic code ever spontaneously come into existence?"

That's not how it works, fella. I cant help it if you cannot grasp the concept of gradual change over time. Completely new genetic code spontaneously appearing wouldnt be gradual would it? See the problem with your question?

"Darwinism isn't true Science."
No, darwinism is a term used by dipshit creationists. The study of evolution encompasses many fields from geology to DNA analysis. Your ignorance gives me a headache.

Lol this is hilarious. How did a chicken gradually change into a new, never before seen species gradually over time? Where is the fossil record of this gradual metamorphosis? It doesn't exist in the fossil record dumdum.

DNA is like software. Kinds are like body plans. Blueprints. Schematics. Dog and Wolves are still canines. Same "Kind". Cats and lions = same kinds. Are you getting it now? Give me an example of one "kind" magically changing into another that has never before been seen. You can't because they don't exist.

Want to know why chickens and cats can't procreate? Not the same "kind". It's genetically an impossibility so what magical force triggered this "gradual BS" you keep spewing?

Cite one example of ANY NEW (never before seen genetic code) coming into existence and being legible, ordered and working. There are no examples that can be given. Not even that fraud Dawkins can provide one example. If Evolution was real, there would be countless examples that could be given. There are so many holes in this BS theory from back in the 1800s than swiss cheese.

You also just contradicted yourself and admitted it's not observable because of this magical belief of "slow changes over time" (that don't exist). It is not something that can actually be observed and tested in the field, yet you claimed it was testable.

GG dumbass