Anita Sarkeesian

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The whole industry is talking about journalistic integrity now. Stop pretending that gamergate is about two women, it started with one woman and five guys. Coincidentally around the same time Anita Sarkeesian and her movement's intentions were exposed and then gamergate officially went live. Now that Anita has lost the bulk of her financial support and influence she can't be the source of division that she had been in past years, gamergate is now concentrating on the broader picture and hitting the corrupted sites where it hurts naming names etc..

It's pretty much like when Atheism+ lost all of it's credibility but in a multi billion dollar industry.

exposing what though? nothing has been exposed or needs to be.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

These things have been explained to you 50 times. This entire thread describes in detail everything wrong with Anita and the direction the movement she is behind. You are worse than Ken Ham was when Bill obliterated him in that debate ignoring facts and stuttering "...but the Bible" over and over again. That's what you sound like.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

These things have been explained to you 50 times. This entire thread describes in detail everything wrong with Anita and the direction the movement she is behind. You are worse than Ken Ham was when Bill obliterated him in that debate ignoring facts and stuttering "...but the Bible" over and over again. That's what you sound like.

everything that this forum has in it, is not exposing.. its just people not liking her message.

thats not exposing, thats just saying u dont like what she likes.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Her message is irrelevant when she's a liar and a thief. She stole over $150,000 from the public (receiving under false pretenses is theft).

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Her message is irrelevant when she's a liar and a thief. She stole over $150,000 from the public (receiving under false pretenses is theft).

She never stole anything lol thats just lies

[iruinedyourday]

for someone who wants people to not assume shit (cop killed a innocent black person cus they were racist) you sure like to think that the same internet can confirm without a doubt that someone they dont like stole money without the court being involved.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

She never stole anything lol thats just lies

The burden of proof is on you to show that the $150,000 Anita received was spent as intended. Spent to fund her research for her youtube videos. The 5 youtube videos she's made over the past two years at $30,000 a pop. That's on you buddy.

[iruinedyourday]

Lol no it's not [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[radditsu]

Developer does not equal publisher. Quit confusing the two.


Also who cares about some dumb cunt stealing money. Dont give your money to dumb cunts
Only give money to people you trust or someone with a real, realistic plan. If you see someone who wants to hire fucking dreamworks or ILM or sone shit like that. Do not do them. 150k for something Spoony or Linkara or Brad Jones does for far....far less is a red flag....a giant red flag.

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The burden of proof is on you to show that the $150,000 Anita received was spent as intended. Spent to fund her research for her youtube videos. The 5 youtube videos she's made over the past two years at $30,000 a pop. That's on you buddy.

That's absurd. The burden of proof is on the one making the allegation. Until proven otherwise, one must assume she spent the money as intended. Otherwise, we'd be living under a "guilty until proven innocent" system.