![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#22
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Fingon, 60 Druid, <Taken>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#23
|
||||
|
Quote:
Even a 60 charming a high 40s mob, will have occasional 30s breaks and regular 3-4 minute breaks. Especially if you are grouping without a shaman/Mage who is maloing and a chanter who is tashing.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#24
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by Teppler; 09-08-2014 at 11:11 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
With necros having lich + undead nukes + charmed pets they are often the best consistent dps by far in many high end dungeons.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#26
|
|||
|
and if they accidentally overnuke and get agro they can feign death
__________________
Escapegoat / Pharmakos / Madriax
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
The problem, it seems to me, is that both of these are the "utility" priest and caster classes. Jack-of-all-Trade classes don't shine as much when required to fill a niche in a full group. This makes them great solo/duo/trio classes, but not a lot to do in a six man.
In a full group, however, I'd prefer the Druid, assuming we're not fighting Undead. Necros have a wider array of abilities and so in a full group will not be able to play up to all their strengths as well. Druids are still going to bring a unique ability (travel aid) that probably isn't being filled by a min-max'd six man group. The group makeup is probably just as important as asking Druid or Necro, though.
__________________
Some kind of... Bubba Ho-Tep?
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|