Raid Rule Madness

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Heebo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wrong. There's no such thing as illegal aggro.

Better not be. How else am I going to get those sweet Tormax faction hits? ohhhh baby

[Uuruk]

Originally Posted by Gimp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't you get tired of begging people to join Red in every thread?

I'm sure everyone is aware Red is there by now.

Don't you get tired of childish arguments over dragon pixels and a line you have to wait in to get pixels.

[radditsu]

Oh jesus fuck play another fucking game

[Bazia]

sev's loot sucks man I can't believe the meltdowns related to this shit

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Every guild there except A-Team had illegal agro on that dragon. I propose a 2 week suspension for all guilds who were present except A-Team.

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

illegal agro

That is not a thing.

[Locust]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sev's loot sucks man I can't believe the meltdowns related to this shit

we're not pissed because of the loot

[Swish]

mad ppl in RNF, who'd have thought

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For those not in the know, Nagafen was engaged by Taken and was being killed - they had Naggy down to 20% and had 30 people engaged. They were in no danger of wiping, but a few BDA people got on the encounter log at the end. There was no collusion between Taken and BDA on the kill and BDA received no compensation whatsoever. Since both BDA and Taken had trackers present before the mob popped, however, TMO said there was a violation and said they were denied a dragon somehow. SO they petitioned to get Sirken's ruling overturned. TMO wanted a dragon from Taken and BDA. BDA offered to not go for the next FFA Naggy.

Naggy's health was 35% and reneging, and the last handful of taken were being summoned and killed. At least 30 BDA ran in and zerged it down so class C wouldn't be able to attempt it. There was no collusion, as Taken did not ask them to do this. However, BDA violated the 2 tracker rule, as they jumped in and helped Taken kill a mob when Taken already had two trackers of their own. Meaning the total force which killed naggy, tracked with more than two trackers pas the zone line. TMO didn't want or ask for a dragon from Taken at all, since they did nothing wrong. Metallikus has no problem telling outright lies.

[Hitpoint]

regening*

Spell check is garbage.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Taken kill a mob when Taken already had two trackers of their own. Meaning the total force which killed naggy, tracked with more than two trackers pas the zone line.

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO didn't want or ask for a dragon from Taken at all, since they did nothing wrong.

wait, did they violate the 2 tracker rule or not? you call anthrax a liar but you're clearly attempting to slant facts to fit the TMO agenda. hypocrite.