Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-14-2010, 01:17 PM
Grakken Grakken is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Kiting was bannable? Seriously?
Kiting was considered an exploit. It was "breaking the encounter."


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They've never adhered to the standard of what "draws people to classic" more, and for a good reason.
I very much disagree here. They don't allow boxing as it would kill the community. If one person (and I can) box 12 clients on one machine, why do I need EQ friends or even a guild? The sense of community was and is the greatest pull to EQ. So imo they are guilty of the above standard in the greatest sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Boxing is a whole other issue - it's been debated before so you can go to one of those threads and express your opinion on it if you really feel it should be allowed.
The point I was making is they clearly change things from classic in order to create the server they want. This isn't a Classic server, this is a modified classic server.

It is not up to me or you whether this massive hate should be on an AE dot. Its up to the Devs. The point of my post is to give information I am unsure whether they have or not.

Even with the above Shadow knights emotional appeal that it indeed should have this much hate on it, I highly doubt it. I'd like to see evidence from the SKs above that it had +400; because, I'd wager they just don't want to get nerfed. Even +100 hate on it would be "OMG this is crazy locked hate."
  #12  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:36 AM
Messianic Messianic is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,122
Default

I really don't think it drew this much aggro on live. Playing around on my gnome necro at level 4ish, I found that it was literally impossible for the pet to take aggro back after I disease clouded the mob, even if i let the pet solo the mob to 40-50%.

That's a very limited experience, but I don't remember my gnome necro on live being able to cast the spell once and be the equivalent of that much damage in terms of hate...
__________________
Heat Wave - Wizard
Messianic - Monk
Melchi Zedek - Necro

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbledorf View Post
I'll look into getting it changed to The Secret Order of the Silver Rose of Truth and Dragons.
  #13  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:29 AM
skootr skootr is offline
Orc


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 49
Default

Yes it was crazy hate on live until some time in PoP I believe. SK's get fucked enough with the XP penility, let them keep the uber aggro.
  #14  
Old 10-15-2010, 12:11 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by girth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is classically accurate and it will not change through the life of this server.
It is almost classically accurate.

It was disease counters that were what caused so much aggro, and some coding changes need to be made to account for this. If you played a shaman during the over DC era, and used disease based dots, you knew ever tick, aggro was going to possibly hit you.

So where the initial 400 might be a bit high, adjustments on the disease counters, are where the aggro should be changed. That way all spells with disease counters, should make lots of aggro. It was sometime in PoP that they fixed disease counters.

But, that being said. DC should be an aggro magnet, along with any spell that uses disease counters. Shaman slow anyone?

Haynar
  #15  
Old 10-15-2010, 03:13 PM
Grakken Grakken is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is almost classically accurate.

It was disease counters that were what caused so much aggro, and some coding changes need to be made to account for this. If you played a shaman during the over DC era, and used disease based dots, you knew ever tick, aggro was going to possibly hit you.

So where the initial 400 might be a bit high, adjustments on the disease counters, are where the aggro should be changed. That way all spells with disease counters, should make lots of aggro. It was sometime in PoP that they fixed disease counters.

But, that being said. DC should be an aggro magnet, along with any spell that uses disease counters. Shaman slow anyone?

Haynar
So to be true to classic, are you going to add +400 hate to shaman slow? Or are we just keeping it "real" with conveniently a tank class.
  #16  
Old 10-15-2010, 03:38 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

To be "real" classic, I would have to make the hate from spells based on disease counters, have a multiplier. And remove the direct 400 hate component. Then it would scale, with the spell's normal hate.

Haynar
  #17  
Old 10-15-2010, 07:28 PM
Sarkov Sarkov is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 84
Default

So... are you planning to make shaman disease spells have crazy hate too, or what? Right now they certainly do not, not anywhere close to DC.
  #18  
Old 10-15-2010, 08:13 PM
Droxx Droxx is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarkov [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So... are you planning to make shaman disease spells have crazy hate too, or what? Right now they certainly do not, not anywhere close to DC.
X2. I wouldn't mind having huge aggro on disease dots.
__________________
Droxx - 60 Oracle!
Xord - 60 Phantasmist!
Phillip - 60 Grandmaster!
Celent - 60 Sorcerer!
Stratah - 58 Troubadour!
Joan - 58 Knight!
Colin - 52 Rake!

Guild Leader of <Eclipse>
  #19  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:11 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

When I have time, some adjustments might be made. I am focusing on other things right now.

Haynar
  #20  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:37 PM
quellren quellren is offline
Fire Giant

quellren's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: I'm homeless.
Posts: 564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grakken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Kiting was considered an exploit. It was "breaking the encounter."
Oddly enough, they really only laid the smackdown on aggro kiting, apparently fear-kiting was OK. Most likely because the player couldn't control the pathing of the mob. Which made it appealing really only to Necros at the time. It was removed before anyone got animal fear.
After the period of ban-ability it was decided that if it wasn't an exploit, it was still highly discouraged, and thus, ALL DoTs, ticked for half damage if you were running away. I was playing a lowbie enchanter at the time and remember it taking FOREVER to aggro kite sand scarabs. Ironically, I don't believe this applied to bards.
Whatever the case, SoE apparently somehow never considered that giving a class both movement impairment AND Damage Over Time spells would result in stacking them and playing 'Nanni-nanni-boo-boo, You can't catch me!" with mobs that would make most into paste. Go Figure.
There was a good bit of time when the only ones not going toe-to-toe in combat, or root-rotting were wizards (snare+rain) and necros (snare/fear/dot/pet). Bards were the only ones that were still effectively kiting in the traditional sense.

'Twas a sad time for druids, to be sure.

Edit: DC on my shaman rocked my world every time I cast it. I've cast it exactly twice on my lowbie necro, as my pet doesn't have a prayer of holding aggro when I stack just Heat Blood and Darkness. No way am I gonna get DC off without wearing the mob all up in my grille. I swear they remember that shit even through Feign Death. It'd kick ass if you were gonna aggro kite, though. Hmmmmm.
Last edited by quellren; 10-15-2010 at 11:43 PM.. Reason: Pertinent info to the discussion
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.