Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-13-2014, 09:53 AM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Socratic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I hope VP boils down to kill at entrance and anyone logged in when the dragon spawns can't fte (wtb mechanic that banishes these players if they touch the dragon). I have zero interest in frapsing the zone in non-stop to try to police certain people that cheat wherever possible.
Or just have a mechanic where whenever a dragon spawns it banishes everyone to right outside of vp (or entrance, whatever). Yeah, it's not classic, but neither is layer after layer of rules. Having to police where people log in at is just terrible.
  #32  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:24 PM
Frug Frug is offline
Fire Giant

Frug's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Suburbia Atlanta
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Glad you took the bait. I'd hate for you to be inconsistent.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
EQ Emulator population tracker - https://unixgeek.com/eqemu.html
  #33  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:29 PM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

Sirken:

What in the world does outlawing mage tracking have to do with the FTE problem?

You want us to race, but you for some reason don't like coth racing? It just seems like a very short sighted addition to the rules.

Any time you artificially designate that a certain class cannot do a certain thing, there should be a damn good reason for it, and it should be explained because it is unfairly discriminatory to people who have invested time and effort. Oh and it sure as hell isn't classic.

The scheme of rules this server has implemented just took a major turn for the worse.

Dolic
  #34  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:31 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

I'm not sure what any of this has to do with mages tracking. This rule seems arbitrary. Trakanon engages have never been as clean as they are right now.
  #35  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:32 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

I really don't care with reguards to other mobs, but can Trakanon be the exception to this rule please?
  #36  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:33 PM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

If the issue is that you dont want to coth pullers to out door dragons, then just make that rule. A blanket ban in all situations is overly broad.

Dolic
  #37  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:33 PM
Dragonsblood1987 Dragonsblood1987 is offline
Sarnak

Dragonsblood1987's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MURIKA
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sirken:

What in the world does outlawing mage tracking have to do with the FTE problem?

You want us to race, but you for some reason don't like coth racing? It just seems like a very short sighted addition to the rules.

Any time you artificially designate that a certain class cannot do a certain thing, there should be a damn good reason for it, and it should be explained because it is unfairly discriminatory to people who have invested time and effort. Oh and it sure as hell isn't classic.

The scheme of rules this server has implemented just took a major turn for the worse.

Dolic
it has more to do with mages parking their pets right where shit spawns so that they get fte without any sort of effort.
__________________
"Something something darkness something"-Nietzsche
  #38  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:44 PM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it has more to do with mages parking their pets right where shit spawns so that they get fte without any sort of effort.
Pets on spawn is already fixed by the fte spam ban. It is done to stop mages from cothing pullers. who then can immediately fte.

Dolic
  #39  
Old 07-13-2014, 01:01 PM
rgostic rgostic is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eponymous Anonymous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
orly?





Looks to me like Class R proposed this first and Class C defended the use of FTE trackers and thus autofire.

Turns out you're not the visionary you thought you were, Unbrella.

Feel free to peruse the original post here: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=139118
Haha this umbrella girl looks like a complete fool.
  #40  
Old 07-13-2014, 01:06 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it has more to do with mages parking their pets right where shit spawns so that they get fte without any sort of effort.
This would already be prohibited by the "nobody tracking can FTE" rule. And a pet passed the zone in already counts as a tracker passed the zone in.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.