?

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

to suggest that different means inferior is very racist.

Pretty much what we have been trying to explain to you.

[Dragonsblood1987]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty much what we have been trying to explain to you.

show me literally anywhere that i said it meant inferior lol

[Cistern]

Originally Posted by Bruno [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you think about it $500 is nothing if you have a real job. That's like a day and a half at work compared to the amount of time spent on all of that shit lol.

This shits been going on for over a decade now in every mmo. Most people are pretty used to it by now I would say.

Bruno confirmed RMTer, can it be more obvious? top lel

[Bruno]

Originally Posted by Cistern [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bruno confirmed RMTer, can it be more obvious? top lel

I wouldn't use my hard earned money to pay your mom's rent. Good try though.

[Neno]

Originally Posted by Cistern [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

top lel

Scaphism, also known as the boats, was an ancient Persian method of execution designed to inflict torturous death that was described by the Persians' archenemies, the Greeks. The name comes from the Greek σκάφη, skáphe, meaning "anything scooped (or hollowed) out".

The intended victim was stripped naked and then firmly fastened within the interior space of two narrow rowing boats (or hollowed-out tree trunks) joined together one on top of the other with the head, hands and feet protruding. The condemned was forced to ingest milk and honey to the point of developing a severe bowel movement and diarrhea, and more honey would be poured on him to attract insects, with special attention devoted to the eyes, ears, mouth, genitals, and anus. In some cases, the executioner would mix milk and honey and pour that mixture all over the victim. He would then be left to float on a stagnant pond or be exposed to the sun. The defenseless individual's feces accumulated within the container, attracting more insects which would eat and breed within his exposed flesh, which—pursuant to interruption of the blood supply by burrowing insects—became increasingly gangrenous. The individual would be lying there naked, covered from head to toe in milk, honey, and their own feces. The feeding would

be repeated each day in some cases to prolong the torture, so that fatal dehydration or starvation did not occur. Death, when it eventually occurred, was probably due to a combination of dehydration, starvation and septic shock. Delirium would typically set in after a few days.

[Cistern]

Originally Posted by Neno [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Scaphism, also known as the boats, was an ancient Persian method of execution designed to inflict torturous death that was described by the Persians' archenemies, the Greeks. The name comes from the Greek σκάφη, skáphe, meaning "anything scooped (or hollowed) out".

The intended victim was stripped naked and then firmly fastened within the interior space of two narrow rowing boats (or hollowed-out tree trunks) joined together one on top of the other with the head, hands and feet protruding. The condemned was forced to ingest milk and honey to the point of developing a severe bowel movement and diarrhea, and more honey would be poured on him to attract insects, with special attention devoted to the eyes, ears, mouth, genitals, and anus. In some cases, the executioner would mix milk and honey and pour that mixture all over the victim. He would then be left to float on a stagnant pond or be exposed to the sun. The defenseless individual's feces accumulated within the container, attracting more insects which would eat and breed within his exposed flesh, which—pursuant to interruption of the blood supply by burrowing insects—became increasingly gangrenous. The individual would be lying there naked, covered from head to toe in milk, honey, and their own feces. The feeding would

be repeated each day in some cases to prolong the torture, so that fatal dehydration or starvation did not occur. Death, when it eventually occurred, was probably due to a combination of dehydration, starvation and septic shock. Delirium would typically set in after a few days.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Dragonsblood1987]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty much what we have been trying to explain to you.

cmon man, ive given you several chances to prove your point. it seems like youre believing what you want to believe, despite the actual evidence of what ive said (youre probably a filthy fucking bible thumper, too, arent you?). i kinda feel like this is your side of the argument:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pquYAEfbBFM

[Juryiel]

Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im still waiting for someone to actually show me where i said anything racist. youre all just regurgitating politically correct, scientifically wrong rhetoric that youve had pounded into your brains from the time you were learning to read. its an absolute shame that youre so backwards in your beliefs, and so insecure and sensitive about obvious, proven differences that you'd rather just parrot "racism" in stead of objectively looking at the proof. why are you so afraid of facts?

Are you sure that's what's going on here? Are you sure that what's going on here isn't instead that you implied that people of Africa are a different species and then tried to use a technicality of an example (Cromags & Neanderthals can reproduce!) that doesn't actually apply in the context of different modern human races for reasons explained to you (even though Neanderthals & Cromags could theoretically reproduce, they rarely did, and genetic differences were rather large*), which fit well within the default scientific definition of 'species', to defend your claims on 'scientific' grounds which, instead of being based on actual science, are instead supported by your provided link to someone who says gems like "I want my grandchildren to look like my grandparents. I don't want them to look like Anwar Sadat or Fu Manchu or Whoopi Goldberg"** ?




*

Originally Posted by Caramelli et. al 2003, PNAS

Following the most stringent current standards for validation of ancient DNA sequences, we typed the mtDNA hypervariable region I of two anatomically modern Homo sapiens sapiens individuals of the Cro-Magnon type dated at about 23 and 25 thousand years ago. Here we show that the mtDNAs of these individuals fall well within the range of variation of today's humans, but differ sharply from the available sequences of the chronologically closer Neandertals. This discontinuity is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that both Neandertals and early anatomically modern humans contributed to the current European gene pool.
[...]
These results are at odds with the view whereby Neandertals were genetically related with the anatomically modern ancestors of current Europeans or contributed to the present day human gene pool. Although only six HVRI sequences of ancient [anatomically modern humans] and four sequences of Neandertals are available to date, the sharp differentiation among them represents a problem for any model regarding the transition from archaic to modern humans as a process taking place within a single evolving human lineage.

**
Wikipedia quote, too lazy to figure out any relevant context :P

[Dragonsblood1987]

Originally Posted by Juryiel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

(Cromags & Neanderthals can reproduce!) that doesn't actually apply in the context of different modern human races for reasons explained to you (even though Neanderthals & Cromags could theoretically reproduce, they rarely did?

actually its believed that they reproduced so frequently, that neanderthals were essentially bred out of existence. they were genetically different, yes, but their brain size, intelligence, behavior (like hunting, burying their dead, making tools ect), were very similar. keep in mind that when it comes to genetics, even a fraction of a percent is a substantial difference. we're something like 96% genetically identical to chips.



What im asking though, is for glenzig, with his glazed-eyed accusations to cite me once saying that despite the genetic differences between races anyone is inferior, superior, should be treated differently, or disliked because of them. which obviously he cant because i never said anything of the sort. acknowledging differences isnt racist in any way, shape, or form. using those differences as grounds for disliking or treating someone differently however is.

[Dragonsblood1987]

oh, forgot to add this. to elaborate a bit on how commonly its believed the two species mated, literally every human in existence has some level of neanderthal DNA. in fact, certain diseases like type 2 diabetes, lupus, and crohns are associated with the vestigial neanderthal DNA that we all possess. the % of neanderthal DNA varies from individual to individual, but its consistently there in some form. its influence varies depending on the % present and the particular structure of the body (skin typically having the most, while reproductive organs have the least. sometimes none at all).