Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:46 PM
phacemeltar phacemeltar is offline
Planar Protector

phacemeltar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: western hemisphere
Posts: 1,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erectus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's another thing... their guildy cleric rolled on the HBC... if this group was supposedly NBG like they are claiming, WHY DID A CASTER ROLL ON IT? Either the group was FFA (and that's being fair) or it was just a group built to hoard all the loots onto those guild members.

If they were just greed rolling it and Twin actually needed it, why shouldn't he be allowed to take it?
imo that is the risk you take rolling with a guild group. if one were to go kill a dragon with a raid guild, wouldnt it be wise to expect the same result? twin was just opportunistic to find a loophole, more power to him. he was probably robbing (pickpocket) the shit out of their mobs the whole time anyways.
__________________
  #72  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:46 PM
Invoke Invoke is offline
Kobold

Invoke's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erectus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They are claiming that it was an NBG group.... do you understand what that means? NEED before greed. if their cleric was rolling on it, it's not NBG.
Then it wasn't a NBG group and should he rolled on. There is no circumstance here that would make loot and scoot OK.
  #73  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:50 PM
Erectus Erectus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 263
Default

He didn't skoot from the group... while we were discussing it and trying to figure out the system, the ornary guildies got impatient and decided to kick us rather than trying to come to an agreement. Their immediate reaction was flame and blame, then to the forums to name and shame.
  #74  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:53 PM
Erectus Erectus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 263
Default

all the loots they looted previously should've been rolled on then.. They never even offered to make a roll on them AFTER the HBC was looted. They clearly were just taking as much as they could get their hands on. Twin got his hands on something he needed.
  #75  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:54 PM
Tuffpuppy Tuffpuppy is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erectus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He didn't skoot from the group... while we were discussing it and trying to figure out the system, the ornary guildies got impatient and decided to kick us rather than trying to come to an agreement. Their immediate reaction was flame and blame, then to the forums to name and shame.
Because looting a valuable item then refusing to roll on it deserves being shamed.
  #76  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:55 PM
Invoke Invoke is offline
Kobold

Invoke's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 110
Default

I understand where you are coming from. All I'm saying is that the only logical solution is for the item to be rolled on by those in the party that want it. Until both sides agree to this, it's just a bunch of pissing into the wind.
  #77  
Old 07-07-2014, 01:58 PM
Erectus Erectus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 263
Default

He might've accepted an NBG roll but that roll would not include the casters in the group. They are claiming here that the rules was nbg, but it clearly WAS NOT.
  #78  
Old 07-07-2014, 02:02 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,350
Default

Wait, let me catch up.

Something dropped, someone looted it.. they were OK with rolling on it, but you kicked him before you could?

That's the jist of every comment from everyone who was in the group.. so unless that's incorrect you guys either need to A. figure out how to communicate on the forums better. or B figure out how to communicate in your groups better.

seems like either way what we got here is a...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2f-MZ2HRHQ
  #79  
Old 07-07-2014, 02:02 PM
daasgoot daasgoot is offline
Planar Protector

daasgoot's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,220
Default

I have only been playing on P99 since the beginning of 2014, but i have a 55 bard, 32monk, 22dru, 20nec, 20clr

I have never once been in a group that did FFA loot on anything of value. ever.

in my experience, it has always been FFA trash loot.. roll on valuable loot.

I have also never been in a group that did NBG loot.

NBG is stupid in my opinion. you either need the item itself or you need the pp the item could be sold for so you can buy an item you need.. so IMO every item is need if it is trade-able and is worth a significant amount of pp.

i say roll for the fukin cloak and be done with this nonsense.
  #80  
Old 07-07-2014, 02:02 PM
Snikliweed Snikliweed is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erectus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He might've accepted an NBG roll but that roll would not include the casters in the group. They are claiming here that the rules was nbg, but it clearly WAS NOT.
Quit trying to cover up the mess you have caused yourself if you and your buddy wouldn't have been a jack ass in the first place none of this would of even had to happen. All he had to do was roll on it hell he might of even won.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.